uuid VS Fiber

I use Google's UUID package a lot. But every time I refer to it in a new package, the language server picks up https://github.com/gofrs/uuid instead of https://github.com/google/uuid and then complains that the gofrs package isn't in go.mod. I assume because it's the first alphabetically (though this seems like a huge supply chain security loophole).

Just store one single UUID as a token in a client's cookie (use https://github.com/google/uuid for ex), and associate that to a user ID (or anything else relevant in your case), and an expiry date for example

Depends on your needs I think, I generally just use github.com/google/uuid like /u/wowsux mentioned it supports v1 through v5 of the UUID spec.

And we are also going to use google/uuid to generate random uuids.

If you are using "github.com/google/uuid", try the following codes

You can see the same naming dilemma in many Go library implementations, i.e., where a package is used to organize functions related to a single a type (https://github.com/google/uuid) vs organizing code of related functionality (https://github.com/golang/go/tree/master/src/math).

Type inference is not perfect yet (especially for functional options). Also not being able to add type parameters to methods is a bit annoying (can be worked around using package-level functions) but besides that generics fit quite nicely into the library. If type inference gets better then I think I can even remove the hard dependency on github.com/google/uuid and let users use custom types for ids.

Learn how to create UUIDs: https://github.com/google/uuid

To make my life easier, I added Fiber, a popular lightweight framework. Regardless of which package you use, the process and most of the code will remain unchanged.

Since you're from Nodejs just like me, I use fiber https://gofiber.io/ it's easier to understand from a Nodejs background (express, etc) and there's nothing wrong using it if you know it, your casual application wont need all the performance in the world Go provides

I think u should try Fiber it's the fastest according to the benchmarks and imo it's the best I love it!!!

Boneless is a powerful tool that offers a wide range of features to facilitate application development. In this blog post, we will explore some essential tools that can be used in conjunction with Boneless: Service Weaver, Go Migrate, SQLC, and Fiber. Let's discover how these tools can boost productivity and efficiency in application development.

Fiber

Fibber is web framework written in Go. It is very easy to learn. https://gofiber.io

don’t have an API at all - it’s a security vulnerability and unless you already know how to secure an API suite it’s very likely to increase risk for a dependent project. if you’re set on an API, use a well known routing package (e.g I love gofiber), and add an optional .withMiddleware() to your start func to allow clients to extend and secure the API themselves

I have loved using fiber. Very nice API with lots of configurability and it scales very well compared to echo, gin, etc.