gojq VS zed

Yeap i've talked to itchyny quite a lot about various changes https://github.com/itchyny/gojq/issues/153 and also upstreamed quite a lot https://github.com/itchyny/gojq/issues?q=author%3Awader like custom iterators (to allow eval, own iterators and "empty" functions), query marshalling (query rewrite tricks) and a bunch of small things and bug fixes. But the largest change to add a JQValue interface is quite complex, other changes like extended literals is also a bit tricky.

Hmm weird list of changes for https://github.com/wader/gojq/compare/fq...itchyny:gojq:main but i guess it is because i haven't kept my main branch in sync. The fq branch should be based on latest gojq/main as of now. I usually try to rebase as quick as possible.

Let me know if you have any other questions or want to help out! maybe email etc as i usually don't check HN comments replies that often :)

gojq has support for yaml input (via a very annoying argument name) and also has the golang property of "curl binary; chmod; profit": https://github.com/itchyny/gojq#difference-to-jq

It's error reporting is also clang-vs-gcc level wizardry, and I often use it to get a helpful message instead of "ENOWORKY" from jq (I haven't tried 1.7 yet, so it could be better for all I know)

Some competition for https://github.com/itchyny/gojq. I had read somewhere that it was faster than jq - no idea if that's still the case.

JQ has a go implementation usable as a library I see. The project looks fairly active https://github.com/itchyny/gojq

I've been getting a lot of mileage out of https://github.com/itchyny/gojq#readme recently due to two things: its vastly superior error messages and the (regrettably verbose) `--yaml-input` option

I also have https://github.com/01mf02/jaq#readme installed but just haven't needed it

I use gojq with --yaml-input or --yaml-output and flip back and forth between JSON and YAML promiscuously and have 100% jq UI compat, which helps because I use jq a lot. First thing I looked at on yq is '-s', which is 'slurp' for jq. Slightly altered semantics would just trip me up, and it seems like you can make a nearly straight bijection between YAML and jq so you can just do exactly the same things with either one (with some minor exceptions.)

https://github.com/itchyny/gojq

jq https://github.com/itchyny/gojq

github.com/itchyny/gojq -> similar to goawk, except JQ this time

VAST is an open-source SecDataOps project for working with data from open-source security tools. Version 3.0 adds a pipeline syntax similar to splunk, Kusto, PRQL, and Zed.

Cool, I didn't realize you used sqlite-utils for your performance demo!

It's not particularly designed for speed - it should be fast as far as Python code goes (I use some generator tricks to stream data and avoid having to load everything into memory at once) but I wouldn't expect "sqlite-utils insert" to win any performance competitions with tools written in other languages.

Those benchmarks against sqlite itself are definitely interesting. I'm looking forward to playing with the "native ZNG support for Python" mentioned on https://github.com/brimdata/zed/blob/main/docs/libraries/pyt... when that becomes available.

Hi, all. Author here. Thanks for all the great feedback.

I've learned a lot from your comments and pointers.

The Zed project is broader than "a jq alternative" and my bad for trying out this initial positioning. I do know there are a lot of people out there who find jq really confusing, but it's clear if you become an expert, my arguments don't hold water.

We've had great feedback from many of our users who are really productive with the blend of search, analytics, and data discovery in the Zed language, and who find manipulating eclectic data in the ZNG format to be really easy.

Anyway, we'll write more about these other aspects of the Zed project in the coming weeks and months, and in the meantime, if you find any of this intriguing and want to kick the tires, feel free to hop on our slack with questions/feedback or file GitHub issues if you have ideas for improvements or find bugs.

Thanks a million!

https://github.com/brimdata/zed

In my observation, mock data has tended to be used in a rather loose, slipshod, careless manner. Unlike documentation, it is treated as the garbage of software material. (Sometimes even referred to as "garbage data"). People will try to avoid writing it by using elaborate "generators" such as jFairy or zed.

There are a few examples in the ZSON spec...

https://github.com/brimdata/zed/blob/main/docs/formats/zson....

And you can easily see whatever data you'd like formatted as ZSON using the "zq" CLI tool, but I just made this gist (with some data from the brimdata/zed-sample-data report) so you can have a quick look (the bstring stuff is a little noisy and an artifact of the data source being Zeek)... https://gist.github.com/mccanne/94865d557ca3de8abfd3eb09e8ac...