GoCover.io
GoCover.io offers the code coverage of any golang package as a service. (by vieux)
GoLint
[mirror] This is a linter for Go source code. (deprecated) (by golang)
Our great sponsors
GoCover.io | GoLint | |
---|---|---|
4 | 6 | |
229 | 3,883 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.6 | |
about 1 year ago | almost 3 years ago | |
Go | Go | |
MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
GoCover.io
Posts with mentions or reviews of GoCover.io.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-27.
-
GitHub code coverage badge
That was one of the options I considered. To create something reusable by others, though, I think that requires creating the Gist, configuring the Gist's URL and creating/configuring an authentication token. This OTOH just requires enabling the Wiki.
-
Any way to show cumulative code coverage using GitHub Actions for free?
https://gocover.io/ https://github.com/vieux/gocover.io
GoLint
Posts with mentions or reviews of GoLint.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-01.
-
9 Golang Name Conventions Gophers should follow!
Actually in the early days of Go, devs were stuck to camalCase/PascalCase on variable naming. But VScode Go plugin managed by Microsoft at that time , and they suggested ID over id/ID, XML over xml/ Xml. Because VScode is free, it attached many users and using uppercase for abbreviations/ initialisms became a standard. Andhttps://github.com/golang/lint/issues/124 finalized it. But , still I think it is a wrong decision.
-
VS Code Extension for autocomplete function parameters and best linter?
As for linting, go vet and [staticcheck](staticcheck.io) are the recommended tools, according to the now deprecated golint repository.
-
I wrote a markdown to html converter
golint is deprecated, and it’s no longer required to comment every exported variable/function/struct, etc.
-
go config on mac
not found error (go tools not found issue explained below), can also check here
- A basic polynomial library
-
What are the REST API reference projects that can be used as a guide in 2021?
about Initialisms; Personally I still prefer simple initial conventions (lowerCamelCase, UpperCamelCase, UPPERCASE) Go followed before VSCODE/Microsoft suggested ID or Id (ex. https://github.com/golang/lint/issues/124). Following one pattern everywhere is the best. In Go, a name is exported if it begins with a capital letter. ex URL; if any unexported var/const start with "URL", what do you do?
What are some alternatives?
When comparing GoCover.io and GoLint you can also consider the following projects:
goast-viewer - Golang AST visualizer
staticcheck
gcvis - Visualise Go program GC trace data in real time
goimports - [mirror] Go Tools
go-checkstyle - checkstyle for go
dupl - a tool for code clone detection
gosimple
errcheck - errcheck checks that you checked errors.
go-outdated
Go Metalinter