go2funk
mo
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go2funk
-
Test Golang 18-beta1 with Docker Dev Environments
If you want to know how to configure your own repository for Golang 18 and Dev Environment, or just try Generics with an already existing project, you can take a look here
mo
-
Functional Programming Library for Golang by IBM
A simple alternative is the combination of:
- https://github.com/samber/lo
- https://github.com/samber/mo
The split is also nice as you can choose to just use the generic convenience functions from lo without the more FP related things from mo.
-
Handling nil values: Pointers vs Abstractions
Is it a popular approach to use abstractions in general for handling nil values with libraries like null or mo? Should I just stick with pointers? What are your experiences on this topic?
-
samber/lo utility package based on generics
I really like it. Have been using it for a while, just don't overuse it. Also, I recommend github.com/samber/mo
-
Switching from C++ to Rust
Go generics allow all kinds of things https://github.com/samber/mo
-
I know there is no OPTIONALS in go , i hope they implement it , what is the best approach to deal with optionals in go? sometimes i think the default values added by golang isn’t suitable, like adding zero to int ! .. zero is a value not nil or undefined.
Have you taken a look at mo? https://github.com/samber/mo
-
What the state of functional programming ecosystem ?
If you are curious, try looking at github.com/samber/lo and github.com/samber/mo packages if you get a chance.
-
Reduce Boilerplate in Go Http Handlers with Go Generics
I have seen https://github.com/samber/mo but it's a niche. Monads aren't popular in Golang community.
- Monads for Go, Using Generics (Option, Result, Either)
-
Expected vs Unexpected errors in Go
I've also looked at the mo library, in particular to use Option[User] but that's really just a slightly safer way to represent User* here. (Safer because you're forced to check if there's a value and so don't have the same accidental panic risk.)
- Monads and popular FP abstractions, powered by Go 1.18 Generics
What are some alternatives?
functools - Functional tools in Go 1.18 using newly introduced generics
lo - 💥 A Lodash-style Go library based on Go 1.18+ Generics (map, filter, contains, find...)
gogu - A comprehensive, reusable and efficient concurrent-safe generics utility functions and data structures library.
fp-go - fp-go is a collection of Functional Programming helpers powered by Golang 1.18+ generics.
devenvs-golang-generics
valor - Go option and result types that optionally contain a value
underscore - 🌟 Useful functional programming helpers for Go
go-strm - A rich Map/Reduce API in Go
gofp - A super simple Lodash like utility library with essential functions that empowers the development in Go
fuego - Functional Experiment in Golang