go-upx
0install
go-upx | 0install | |
---|---|---|
3 | 6 | |
9 | 478 | |
- | 0.2% | |
10.0 | 1.4 | |
over 1 year ago | about 1 year ago | |
Go | OCaml | |
MIT License | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go-upx
0install
-
rkill caught something in my pc, I deleted it and it came back.
Checking for processes to terminate: * C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\0install.net\implementations\sha256new_WNVUT4A7COIHUPNX3HWQQZD5BU3GEPFRMM3BLVJW4ICRXIJEKBJQ\CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe (PID: 3484) [UP-HEUR] * C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\0install.net\implementations\sha256new_WNVUT4A7COIHUPNX3HWQQZD5BU3GEPFRMM3BLVJW4ICRXIJEKBJQ\CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe (PID: 13500) [UP-HEUR] * C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\0install.net\implementations\sha256new_WNVUT4A7COIHUPNX3HWQQZD5BU3GEPFRMM3BLVJW4ICRXIJEKBJQ\CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe (PID: 13464) [UP-HEUR] * C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\0install.net\implementations\sha256new_WNVUT4A7COIHUPNX3HWQQZD5BU3GEPFRMM3BLVJW4ICRXIJEKBJQ\CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe (PID: 13972) [UP-HEUR] * C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\0install.net\implementations\sha256new_WNVUT4A7COIHUPNX3HWQQZD5BU3GEPFRMM3BLVJW4ICRXIJEKBJQ\CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe (PID: 3352) [UP-HEUR]
-
Using jlink to cross-compile minimal JREs
Sounds like https://0install.net which has been around for a while.
Personally I prefer to avoid 'installing' anything: if something's written in Java, its launcher should reference some specific java binary; if something's written in Python, it should reference some specific python3 binary; etc.
For example, my job is mostly writing Scala and building it with Maven; yet I have neither installed system-wide. Instead, they're just dependencies of the build script.
-
Go binding for upx utility
It seems more like a package manager. https://0install.net/
-
Ubuntu's Snap performs application updates without user consent
The article mentions Snap, AppImage and FlatPak, but there is also a much older system called 0install (zero install) that was started in 2003 or so [1].
I wonder why that never took off.
[1] https://zero-install.sourceforge.net/roadmap.html (note this is the old website; the new website is https://0install.net - looks like it's still getting releases in October this year)
- Common local apps code library
-
IObit safe?
Zero Install (GitHub)
What are some alternatives?
pakkero - Pakkero is a binary packer written in Go made for fun and educational purpose. Its main goal is to take in input a program file (elf binary, script, even appimage) and compress it, protect it from tampering and intrusion.
gun - An open source cybersecurity protocol for syncing decentralized graph data.
pub-dev - The pub.dev website