go-generics-tests-bug
Details of a bug in compiling tests files with generic code. (by akshaybharambe14)
mo
🦄 Monads and popular FP abstractions, powered by Go 1.18+ Generics (Option, Result, Either...) (by samber)
| go-generics-tests-bug | mo | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 1 | 2,261 | |
| - | - | |
| 2.6 | 5.9 | |
| over 2 years ago | 6 months ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go-generics-tests-bug
Posts with mentions or reviews of go-generics-tests-bug.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-25.
-
[go1.18beata1] Bug while runnings package tests on generic code
I tried to put all the information in this repository. I tried looking into the Go backlog but didn't find any relevant information. Any help is much appreciated.
mo
Posts with mentions or reviews of mo.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-17.
-
Functional Programming Library for Golang by IBM
A simple alternative is the combination of:
- https://github.com/samber/lo
- https://github.com/samber/mo
The split is also nice as you can choose to just use the generic convenience functions from lo without the more FP related things from mo.
-
Handling nil values: Pointers vs Abstractions
Is it a popular approach to use abstractions in general for handling nil values with libraries like null or mo? Should I just stick with pointers? What are your experiences on this topic?
-
samber/lo utility package based on generics
I really like it. Have been using it for a while, just don't overuse it. Also, I recommend github.com/samber/mo
-
Switching from C++ to Rust
Go generics allow all kinds of things https://github.com/samber/mo
-
I know there is no OPTIONALS in go , i hope they implement it , what is the best approach to deal with optionals in go? sometimes i think the default values added by golang isn’t suitable, like adding zero to int ! .. zero is a value not nil or undefined.
Have you taken a look at mo? https://github.com/samber/mo
-
What the state of functional programming ecosystem ?
If you are curious, try looking at github.com/samber/lo and github.com/samber/mo packages if you get a chance.
-
Reduce Boilerplate in Go Http Handlers with Go Generics
I have seen https://github.com/samber/mo but it's a niche. Monads aren't popular in Golang community.
- Monads for Go, Using Generics (Option, Result, Either)
-
Expected vs Unexpected errors in Go
I've also looked at the mo library, in particular to use Option[User] but that's really just a slightly safer way to represent User* here. (Safer because you're forced to check if there's a value and so don't have the same accidental panic risk.)
- Monads and popular FP abstractions, powered by Go 1.18 Generics