go-containerregistry
rules_docker
go-containerregistry | rules_docker | |
---|---|---|
17 | 8 | |
2,962 | 1,058 | |
1.2% | - | |
6.8 | 0.0 | |
6 days ago | 7 months ago | |
Go | Starlark | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go-containerregistry
-
A gopher’s journey to the center of container images
I also explored another module, go-containerregistry, in order to build images without root privileges. The approach is completely different, and we can manipulate each component of the container image separately. This can present an advantage, if you're looking for a way to fine tune things.
-
Skip build if "${CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE}:${CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA}" exists on container registry
Use crane ls in a different job to check the tags in the registry. Create an artifact from its output that you evaluate in your kaniko job to check if the build should run or not.
-
Docker: We’re No Longer Sunsetting the Free Team Plan
Multi-arch builds are easy to "transfer" IMHO
crane cp docker.io/openfaas/gateway:0.10.0 ghcr.io/openfaas/gateway:0.10.0
If you've not used it yet - do take a look. Crane doesn't pull the images into a local Docker library for re-tagging and re-pushing.
https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/blob/main/cmd...
-
Weekly: This Week I Learned (TWIL?) thread
crane - tool to copy images from one repo to another - https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/blob/main/cmd/crane/doc/crane.md
- Dockerhub to (likely?) delete a lot of organizations.
-
FYI: Docker is deleting Open Source organisations
pretty sure the crane being referred by alex is this one: https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/tree/main/cmd/crane
-
Docker's deleting Open Source images and here's what you need to know
https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry/tree/main/cmd...
It was recommended in this article:
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
This is one of my absolute favorite topics. Pardon me while I rant and self-promote :D
Dockerfiles are great for flexibility, and have been a critical contributor to the adoption of Docker containers. It's very easy to take a base image, add a thing to it, and publish your version.
Unfortunately Dockerfiles are also full of gotchas and opaque cargo-culted best practices to avoid them. Being an open-ended execution environment, it's basically impossible to tell even during the build what's being added to the image, which has downstream implications for anybody trying to get an SBOM from the image for example.
Instead, I contribute to a number of tools to build and manage images without Dockerfiles. Each of them are less featureful than Dockerfiles, but being more constrained in what they can do, you can get a lot more visibility into what they're doing, since they're not able to do "whatever the user wants".
1. https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry is a Go module to interact with images in the registry and in tarballs and layouts, in the local docker daemon. You can append layers, squash layers, modify metadata, etc.
2. crane is a CLI that uses the above (in the same repo) to make many of the same modifications from the commandline. `crane append` for instance adds a layer containing some contents to an image, entirely in the registry, without even pulling the base image.
3. ko (https://ko.build) is a tool to build Go applications into images without Dockerfiles or Docker at all. It runs `go build`, appends that binary on top of a base image, and pushes it directly to the registry. It generates an SBOM declaring what Go modules went into the app it put into the image, since that's all it can do.
4. apko (https://apko.dev) is a tool to assemble an image from pre-built apks, without Docker. It's capable of producing "distroless" images easily with config in YAML. It generates an SBOM declaring exactly what apks it put in the image, since that's all it can do.
Bazel's rules_docker is another contender in the space, and GCP's distroless images use it to place Debian .debs into an image. Apko is its spiritual successor, and uses YAML instead of Bazel's own config language, which makes it a lot easier to adopt and use (IMO), with all of the same benefits.
I'm excited to see more folks realizing that Dockerfiles aren't always necessary, and can sometimes make your life harder. I'm extra excited to see more tools and tutorials digging into the details of how container images work, and preaching the gospel that they can be built and modified using existing tooling and relatively simple libraries. Excellent article!
-
ImagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent - (image doesn’t exist in repo) - Is it possible to pull the micro service image from an EKS node and then push to repo?
Look at using tools like skopeo or crane
-
Containerd... Do I use Docker to build the container image? I miss the Docker Shim
Pretty much any tool works: docker, podman, kaniko, crane(if you're brave), ko... list goes on.
rules_docker
- Ko: Easy Go Containers
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
My company uses Bazel's rules docker to build our images: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker
They're pretty great and have a lot of the caching and parallelism benefits mentioned in the post for free out of the box, along with determinism (which Docker files don't have because you can run arbitrary shell commands). Our backend stack is also built with Bazel so we get a nice tight integration to build our images that is pretty straightforward.
We've also built some nice tooling around this to automatically put our maven dependencies into different layers using Bazel query and buildozer. Since maven deps don't change often we get a lot of nice caching advantages.
-
Does google use rules_docker internally?
I've seen rules_docker is looking for maintainers here ; Does this mean it doesn't use it that much internally? If so, how do they go about using other services e.g docker-compose for running external services e.g database?
-
Speed boost achievement unlocked on Docker Desktop 4.6 for Mac
Did you mean this one? https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker
I was very interested in this Bazel-based way of building containers but its README page says "it is on minimal life support," which does not inspire confidence. How's your experience using it?
-
Build images within another Docker container
As others have said docker in docker or a separate build server are your best options using docker. You can also use Bazel (which doesn't require the docker daemon) to build docker images which will build deterministic images every time due to not incorporating the timestamp: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker
-
Evolution of code deployment tools at Mixpanel
There's some BazelCon talks about people doing similar stuff but not actually open sourcing their code.
P.S. if you use rules_docker please feel free to open a PR to add your company to our README: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker/#adopters
-
Is Docker Dead in the Water?
The docker utility isn't the only way to build and run containers. There's also cri-o, podman, and crun among others for running containers. For building there is podman again, Jib for Java applications, and bazel plus many others. The docker approach of using a client to connect to a daemon required to run as root has turned out to be slow and insecure.
-
Buildpacks vs. Dockerfiles
During the last 3 years I've had the pleasure of using Bazel's rules_docker to generate all my container images (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker).
In a nutshell, rules_docker is a set of build rules for the Bazel build system (https://bazel.build). What's pretty nice about these rules is that they don't rely on a Docker daemon. They are rules that directly construct image tarballs that you can either load into your local Docker daemon or push to a registry.
What's nice about this approach is that image generation works on any operating system. For example, even on a Mac or Windows system that doesn't have Docker installed, you're able to build Linux containers. They are also fully reproducible, meaning that you often don't need to upload layers when pushing (either because they haven't changed, or because some colleague/CI job already pushed those layers).
I guess rules_docker works fine for a variety of programming languages. I've mainly used it with Go, though.
What are some alternatives?
skopeo - Work with remote images registries - retrieving information, images, signing content
buildah - A tool that facilitates building OCI images.
regclient - Docker and OCI Registry Client in Go and tooling using those libraries.
kaniko - Build Container Images In Kubernetes
container-diff - container-diff: Diff your Docker containers
rules_gitops - This repository contains rules for continuous, GitOps driven Kubernetes deployments.
image-spec - OCI Image Format
crun - A fast and lightweight fully featured OCI runtime and C library for running containers
gcr-cleaner - Delete untagged image refs in Google Container Registry or Artifact Registry
jib - 🏗 Build container images for your Java applications.
docker-tools - This is a repo to house some common tools for our various docker repos.
cri-o - Open Container Initiative-based implementation of Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface