go-coap VS californium

Compare go-coap vs californium and see what are their differences.

go-coap

Implementation of CoAP Server & Client in Go (by plgd-dev)
Coap ocf coap-client coap-server coap-noresponse coap-tcp Dtls Multicast UDP pion-dtls IoT blockwise-transfer coap-protocol
Source Code
coap.technology
Suggest alternative
Edit details

californium

CoAP/DTLS Java Implementation (by eclipse-californium)
Eclipseiot Coap IoT internet-of-things Java Dtls
Source Code
eclipse.org
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
go-coap californium
3 1
417 712
2.2% 0.7%
7.9 8.7
14 days ago 4 days ago
Go Java
Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

go-coap

Posts with mentions or reviews of go-coap. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-17.

californium

Posts with mentions or reviews of californium. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2020-09-24.
  • A Field Guide to CoAP, Part 1
    5 projects | dev.to | 24 Sep 2020
    The last goal of CoAP is that it is easy to implement. There are protocol implementations in just about every device-side and cloud-side programming language, with libcoap & californium being defacto reference implementations for devices and servers. But there are specific design features in the protocol that make it easy to implement in constrained environments, like how it uses UDP and a compact message format to save on payload size, but we’ll cover those details shortly.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing go-coap and californium you can also consider the following projects:

Onion - C library to create simple HTTP servers and Web Applications.

leshan - Java Library for LWM2M

MessagePack - MessagePack serializer implementation for Java / msgpack.org[Java]

node-coap - CoAP - Node.js style

dtlspipe - Generic DTLS wrapper for UDP sessions

ditto - Eclipse Ditto™: Digital Twin framework of Eclipse IoT - main repository

ck - Concurrency primitives, safe memory reclamation mechanisms and non-blocking (including lock-free) data structures designed to aid in the research, design and implementation of high performance concurrent systems developed in C99+.

firmata4j - Firmata client written in Java.

Apophenia - A C library for statistical and scientific computing

aiocoap - The Python CoAP library

libcoap - A CoAP (RFC 7252) implementation in C

go-coap vs Onion californium vs leshan go-coap vs MessagePack californium vs node-coap go-coap vs dtlspipe californium vs ditto go-coap vs ck californium vs firmata4j go-coap vs Apophenia californium vs aiocoap go-coap vs aiocoap californium vs libcoap