gnu-parallel VS ranger

You can use GNU Parallel (https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/) to run command-line clients with all of those queries. You can set up the upper limit of simultaneous clients run, and this will automatically handle all possible parallelism.

Some other multi machine options that have worked well for me, well beyond just compilation of C/C++ on multiple machines with multiple cores.

1) set up passwordless, ssh.

and

2) use the gnu parallel. https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/

gnu parallel is super flexible, very useful.

How does this stack up againg GNU parallel? If you just wanna parallelize CLI work-loads (like nmap), parallel should be easier, I guess.

It requires jq for JSON processing and GNU parallel for concurrent searches in the notebooks.

Since you've got lots of images, you could use GNU Parallel to spread the job across multiple CPUs.

Gnu parallel

You could easily use something like GNU Parallel:

https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/

Came to post zoxide. Also if you use `ranger`[1] (vim inspired file manager) then you might like to add the `ranger-zoxide` plugin[2].

1. https://github.com/ranger/ranger

2. https://github.com/jchook/ranger-zoxide

This looks cool, though I already use https://github.com/ranger/ranger for this.

This feature is rarely seen in Linux file managers. I would recommend the CLI file manager ranger. If you need a GUI tool, you should have a look at pantheon files, the file manager of ElementaryOS.

Someone opened an issue about this. Might want to follow that.

Hi! I am using ranger file manager terminal as its best through all i had used, but i have a weird problem and i want to ask you maybe you know how to solve it because my knowledge have limits on this topic even though i researched a bit.

How about ranger

I wrote a ranger integration plugin for myself and I thought I would share.

It adapts ranger in neovim. It is very cool to have so much control, plus the previews.