gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect VS gnome-shell-impatience

You should really make a pull request to the [bluetooth-quick-connect extension](https://github.com/bjarosze/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect) so bjarosze can add it to the next release with gnome 43 support!

Thanks that's perfect. Parent got deleted for some reason; here's their original link, which is the other piece of my puzzle: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1401/bluetooth-quick-connect/ https://github.com/bjarosze/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect

Bluetooth Quick Connect Allows you to connect bluetooth paired devices from the notification center. Even shows connected devices' battery information similar to OSX (currently experimental). https://github.com/bjarosze/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect

Bluetooth Quick Connect adds a toggle for bluetooth devices in the GNOME bluetooth menu. It works as expected and it’s insane to me that this functionality isn’t built into Gnome. Works on 40 and 3.38 Gnome Extensions | GitHub

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/277/impatience/

Focus changer: Change focus between windows in all directions using your keyboard

do people even use gnome without impatience?

Recently, I installed the Impatience GNOME Shell extension in order to double GNOME animations speed.

I wanted to double animations speed in GNOME because I find them slow, and I recently read about the Impatience GNOME Shell extension. I found that cool so I downloaded it, extracted it and moved to my $HOME/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions folder. I downloaded the right version, for my GNOME 41, it shows up in gnome-extensions list and Extensions app. However, as long as the extension is turned on, the animations are completely disabled, which improves my system speed but is not quite what I'm looking for. I'm about to try some alternatives like Just Perfection, but if I'm missing something about Impatience, please let me know: I like its simplicity and I kinda want to use it.