GLI
run
GLI | run | |
---|---|---|
1 | 17 | |
1,241 | 475 | |
- | - | |
4.1 | 3.5 | |
10 months ago | 7 months ago | |
Ruby | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
GLI
-
Just: A Command Runner
I use https://github.com/davetron5000/gli for this, since I work in ruby. Adding something like just or gli to your project is a huge win. Every dev can just `just update_db` to refresh their dev db, `just update_secrets` to update dev secrets. Whatever. So much better than putting snippets in a wiki or whatever.
I like gli because it gives you subcommands, like `gli database refresh` etc.
run
-
Fig Has Joined AWS
I've been using Run [0] for this purposes.
[0]: https://github.com/TekWizely/run
-
Show HN: Xc – A Markdown Defined Task Runner
To the extent that posts like these evolve into discussing the merits of Make as a task runner, I would like to offer my tool for review:
* https://github.com/TekWizely/run
I built it to feel like make, but be better at managing tasks and wrappers.
If you are evaluating task runners and appreciate the simplicity of Make's syntax, I hope you'll give Run a try.
-
Just: A Command Runner
I invite you take a look at Run, a similar tool that I maintain:
* https://github.com/TekWizely/run
Support for including other Runfiles was recently introduced, with support for globbing and the ability to indicate if an error should be generated if no files are found.
- Automatic Makefile help generation
-
DevOps Is Bullshit
Unrelated to this topic, I invite you take a look at my project which a tool purpose-built to be a better version of what your makefile became:
Run: Task runner that helps you easily manage and invoke small scripts and wrappers
https://github.com/TekWizely/run
Defining commands feels like make, but comes with a bunch of extras targeted at the needs of a task-runner.
I hope you'll check it out!
-
sd – a cozy nest for your scripts
This looks like an interesting way to manage scripts globally. I could even see it able to manage n-sub-commands deep (vs usual "command sub-command" - maybe it already does?) by just trying to resolve each argument as a dir until you find a script to execute.
If you're interested in ways to better-manage small scripts and wrappers more locally, please take a look at my project, Run:
https://github.com/TekWizely/run
- Run v0.9.0 - Easily manage and invoke small scripts and wrappers - Now with support for Includes!
-
run VS makesure - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 13 Aug 2022
-
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Makefiles
For those looking for a powerful task runners that feel like a makefile, please take a look at Run:
https://github.com/TekWizely/run
It's better a managing and invoking tasks and generates help text from comments.
What are some alternatives?
Thor - Thor is a toolkit for building powerful command-line interfaces.
bashly - Bash command line framework and CLI generator
Commander - The complete solution for Ruby command-line executables
earthly - Super simple build framework with fast, repeatable builds and an instantly familiar syntax – like Dockerfile and Makefile had a baby.
Rake - A make-like build utility for Ruby.
pure-sh-bible - 📖 A collection of pure POSIX sh alternatives to external processes.
Clamp - a Ruby command-line application framework
doit - task management & automation tool
Slop - Simple Lightweight Option Parsing - ✨ new contributors welcome ✨
shtlang - A toy scripting dynamic imperative programming language.
Trollop - Optimist is a commandline option parser for Ruby that just gets out of your way.
Cake - :cake: Cake (C# Make) is a cross platform build automation system.