gitsign VS git-secret

> does it also filter/escape ANSI Sequences in messages and author names?

Not at present! Do you have a link or so I could use to familiarize myself? I'm curious if it'd fall within gittuf's scope.

> does it block garbage collection?

Nope, it doesn't. That said, the repository will have more objects, gittuf tracks additional objects through custom refs in `refs/gittuf/`.

> how do you ensure that the developers are really the developers and there's no spoofing?

At present, gittuf policies use signing keys. It doesn't rely on the commit metadata for author and committer but rather the commit's signature. We support GPG and Sigstore's gitsign [0] right now, and we want to support other signing mechanisms like SSH keys as well.

[0] https://github.com/sigstore/gitsign

You may want to check out https://github.com/sigstore/gitsign! You can generate ephemeral x509 code signing certs for free using Sigstore.

(disclosure: I'm a maintainer for gitsign)

Def check out the gitsign project mentioned in the post: https://github.com/sigstore/gitsign

Gitsign offers a keyless commit signing implementation based on OIDC, which is an identity layer built on top of the OAuth 2.0 framework. Gitsign supports verifying your identity either through GitHub, Microsoft, or a Google account.

Shameless plug for the gitsign project in sigstore: https://github.com/sigstore/gitsign

This isn't supported by GitHub yet but we're hopefully working towards that too.

We used to actually run an RFC3161 timestamp server in addition to the transparency log but recently turned it down because no one was using it. I'd like to bring it back for stuff like this.

https://github.com/sigstore/gitsign/issues/22

I've happily been using git-secret (https://sobolevn.me/git-secret/) for encrypting non-critical (i.e. non-production) secrets for a while now. It sounds like Gittuf will do a lot more than git-secret, but for the use case of encrypted files specifically, is there a significant different about with the approach that Gittuf has taken?

Secrets inside the repo. All the credentials, ssh keys, VPN configs can be stored directly in the repo with support of the git secret. gpg key is optional: config works fine if it is not provided and secrets are not decrypted.

You might notice that some of the environmental variables have funky values that look more like template placeholders. For example "SESSION_STORAGE_SECRET=${SESSION_STORAGE_SECRET}". That's because there's a .env file that contains those (you can see it in the root of the GitHub repository page. As a good practice I try to isolate anything that needs to be secret right off the top. So even though this is a development setup and would need work to turn it into a something suitable for production let's try to start off right not doing the wrong thing by hardcoding all our secrets into various files. At least now there's just one file to secure. And later on if you move to something really secure like Hashicorp's Vault product, or even something open source like git secret you won't have to hunt all over the place for the secrets to keep. Lets now look at the rest of the Catalyst application setup:

Checkout git-secret. https://git-secret.io/

There‘s plugins like https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt or https://git-secret.io that you can use to encrypt the files for yourself, so that they are available on multiple machines to you

If you really want to have private repositories in GitHub, you will need to set up something like https://git-secret.io on top of git.

If you want a low config solution and not scared of gpg, https://git-secret.io/

Hey guys, so I'm using git-secret as of now. Just stumbled across Mozilla SOPS today and finding it interesting. Which one you guys recommend and why? Advantages and disadvantages of each? I think SOPS is more robust and stable since it is being maintained by a large organization? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Help is appreciated.