brillo VS dotfiles

so first install brillo from AUR or from the gitlab source , also you can look at the reference XF86KeySymfrom references , then in your config.h file add this line ```

In both of those cases, however, there already solutions like picom (to remove tearing) and brillo (to adjust brightness), so I don't really see the point in using vendor-specific DDX drivers nowadays, other than perhaps performance (?).

I've replaced systemd-backlight with a brillo wrapper script, because I miss the smooth backlight restore from Windows.

This is how I install it, then the service file is very similar too it just starts this other picom executable. https://github.com/AlexAegis/dotfiles/blob/master/modules/picom/1.user.sh

I install it from repo like this: https://github.com/AlexAegis/dotfiles/tree/master/modules/powerline

https://github.com/AlexAegis/dotfiles https://github.com/AlexAegis/pont

So I decided that I do something way simpler. I suggest you read my README, or just check out my dotfile repo: https://github.com/alexaegis/dotfiles

Another example on how the modules matter more than pont itself. On it's own it has 0 context on what XDG folder locations are, but I have an xdg module (https://github.com/AlexAegis/dotfiles/tree/master/modules/xdg) that has an environmental file in ~/.config/environment.d listing my XDG config (which is pretty much the default but that doesnt matter) And a named, environment script. These environment scripts are always run, no matter what. And I'm using them to source environmental variables, so if ANOTHER module is dependent on xdg because I'm using these variables, it doesnt matter if my environment has these variables or not, pont will load them, from there.