git-pretty-pull-request
au-packages
| git-pretty-pull-request | au-packages | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 35 | 65 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 9.5 | |
| over 3 years ago | about 7 hours ago | |
| Shell | HTML | |
| - | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
git-pretty-pull-request
-
Bash_unit – bash unit testing framework
I used bats a while ago to test a homemade CLI to open github pull-requests, it worked well enough for me (https://github.com/williamdclt/git-pretty-pull-request if you're looking for an example, although I did not maintain the tests out of laziness so they are very red).
Cannot compare it to bash_unit, but I'm happy there's alternatives!
au-packages
-
FreeRDP: A Remote Desktop Protocol Implementation
I maintain a chocolatey package for Windows. I currently use their snapshot as a source which is not ideal. I could switch to GH actions.
https://github.com/majkinetor/au-packages/tree/master/freerd...
-
Bash_unit – bash unit testing framework
I am only using chocolatey to install stuff and I regularly create packages for it. I worked hard to make what I need stable and not depend on their existence - [2] for examples releases packages on GH and there is a handy script to install from there. I also created AU for it [3] and managed to convince people to embed software in packages so packages always work (you can cache them on your own via file system, artifactory, nexus etc). You can also host your own gallery in number of different ways. So, in short, there is escape plan. TBH, it looks like choco is going better then ever. And you can't simply find any better repository for sw, its better and more up to date then most linux package repos (on par with Arch).
> I am not that into the way MS is doing the winget thing,
That is years away IMO, no scripting there too, and it moves like a snail. I would really be embarrassed if I were leading that team.
> I see a lot of manual scripts for installing things on Windows CI systems
Yeah, most people suck, like their scripts :-) There is literary 0 chance for you to make reliable installation script in general that works in any context.
> I really like chocolatey but I am worried it will disappear soon.
Just use it. I don't work for them. I maintain core team repo [2]. Its great tool now. What will happen tomorrow nobody knows but like I said, you have escape plan and even if they go down your CI will still work for decades if you want if you set it up properly.
---
[1] https://github.com/majkinetor/au-packages
[2] https://github.com/chocolatey-community/chocolatey-coreteamp...
[3] https://github.com/majkinetor/au
What are some alternatives?
shellspec - A full-featured BDD unit testing framework for bash, ksh, zsh, dash and all POSIX shells
bashcov - Code coverage tool for Bash
Install-SqlServer - Powershell script to install MS SQL Server unattended
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
bash_unit - bash unit testing enterprise edition framework for professionals
Easy-GPU-PV - A Project dedicated to making GPU Partitioning on Windows easier!