git-conventional-commits VS vite

> https://direnv.net/ -- when you cd to a directory, do things like set variables.

Just use dotenv instead.

https://asdf-vm.com/ -- manage and use specific versions of software. Can work with direnv too!

May be useful in some cases, but adds a global dependency on asdf itself.

> https://pre-commit.com/ -- git hooks that I personally found easier to manage than Husky.

Git hooks are disturbing and slow down and/or break advanced git interactions.

> https://github.com/qoomon/git-conventional-commits -- enforce standard commit messages. Works with pre-commit!

Only if you want to be so pedantic about them. I find it mostly a waste of time to enforce commit message style.

After installation, it will generate a lefthook.yml file which can be customized to perform a static code analysis before committing the code. For example, it can ensure that the git commit follows the git-conventional-commits, and use Prettier, ESLint, and Stylelint to check, format, and fix any file which will be committed and run any test related with Vitest depending on the filetype and run each in parallel.

As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/