git-conventional-commits VS prettier

> https://direnv.net/ -- when you cd to a directory, do things like set variables.

Just use dotenv instead.

https://asdf-vm.com/ -- manage and use specific versions of software. Can work with direnv too!

May be useful in some cases, but adds a global dependency on asdf itself.

> https://pre-commit.com/ -- git hooks that I personally found easier to manage than Husky.

Git hooks are disturbing and slow down and/or break advanced git interactions.

> https://github.com/qoomon/git-conventional-commits -- enforce standard commit messages. Works with pre-commit!

Only if you want to be so pedantic about them. I find it mostly a waste of time to enforce commit message style.

After installation, it will generate a lefthook.yml file which can be customized to perform a static code analysis before committing the code. For example, it can ensure that the git commit follows the git-conventional-commits, and use Prettier, ESLint, and Stylelint to check, format, and fix any file which will be committed and run any test related with Vitest depending on the filetype and run each in parallel.

In this post, I also use ESLint + Standard JS as my code formatting tools. Formatting JS/TS code by using ESLint is also subjective and opinionated, arguably most people would rather use Prettier instead, which provides more configurable options.

Let's be honest - setting up tools for a new project can be a frustrating process. Especially when you want to jump straight to coding part. This is often the case with ESLint and Prettier, two popular tools in the JavaScript ecosystem that can sometimes interfere with each other when it comes to code formatting. Fortunately, there's a simple solution to this process, and it's called eslint-plugin-prettier.

From my point of view, Prettier doesn't work well for styling with utility classes. For a discussion see Prettier#7863 or Prettier#5948.

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency.

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary.

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem.

prettier is used to format you text

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick).

Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions.