ghz
grpc_bench
ghz | grpc_bench | |
---|---|---|
6 | 58 | |
2,884 | 850 | |
- | - | |
5.8 | 8.4 | |
2 days ago | 1 day ago | |
Go | Dockerfile | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ghz
-
Production Twitter on One Machine: 100Gbps NICs and NVMe Are Fast
I once built a quick and dirty load testing tool for a public facing service we built. The tool was pretty simple - something like https://github.com/bojand/ghz but with traffic and data patterns closer to what we expected to see in the real world. We used argo-workflows to generate scale.
One thing which we noticed was that there was a considerable difference in performance characteristics based on how we parallelized the load testing tool (multiple threads, multiple processes, multiple kubernetes pods, pods forced to be distributed across nodes).
I think that when you run non-distrubuted load tests you benefit from bunch of cool things which happen with http2 and Linux (multiplexing, resource sharing etc) which might make applications seem much faster than they would be in the real world.
-
GRPC Performance Testing , Load Testing
I'm not sure. Maybe you can write to the discussion section of the repo https://github.com/bojand/ghz/discussions
-
Testing gRPC services - request collections and modern load testing
In part 1 we looked at ghz for load testing gRPC services, and now I want to cover k6, which claims to be a modern load testing tool built for developer happiness. After only a brief experience with it I can see why is that and why Grafana moved to acquire k6 earlier this year.
-
grpc_bench: open-source, objective gRPC benchmark
It should be unbound, in this particular benchmark we set ghz concurrency to 50 and connections to 5 and we don't set the rps flag of ghz (e.g. --rps=2000, from this tool)
a second container running ghz makes unary requests to the server
grpc_bench
-
Poor gRPC performance on test - help needed
SayHello, GetUser, and Sum differ only by payload size. Sum is the simplest one - (int, int) -> int, GetUser is (long) -> User (medium payload), and SayHello uses exactly the same payload as this test: https://github.com/LesnyRumcajs/grpc_bench/tree/master/dotnet_grpc_bench
-
2023-06-25 gRPC benchmark results
This is correct. The problem is not with the benchmark itself but with the implementation. If you look at the result, you can see that even with 6 "allowed" CPUs, the vertx server utilizes less than 100%. Apparently, the current vertx implementation (the one implemented in https://github.com/LesnyRumcajs/grpc_bench/tree/master/java_vertx_grpc_bench) is single-threaded or has some other limitation.
Another iteration of grpc_bench!
-
Why does C#/.NET is in demand in Philippines especially in BGC? How about PHP?
Because it's fast and runs on Windows, Linux, and MacOS
- .NET Core performance on Linux
-
Another two cents about the current situation with the Scala user base and economics.
In general though, akka/pekko-streams are known to be one of the fastest implementations out there. Their grpc client for example even beats languages like Rust (see https://www.lightbend.com/blog/akka-grpc-update-delivers-1200-percent-performance-improvement and https://github.com/LesnyRumcajs/grpc_bench/wiki/2022-03-15-bench-results).
-
What is the current status of Akka in your organisation?
The whole point I was making is at least up until 8 months ago (at best, I can't commend on the stability/maturity/performance of shardcake) Akka was the only mature library/ecosystem solving this problem with also a very strong focus on performance (for example still to this day, akka/pekko-grpc is generally one of the fastest grpc implementations I am aware of, its even beating rust if you have at least 2 cores (see https://github.com/LesnyRumcajs/grpc_bench/wiki/2022-03-15-bench-results)
-
QuickBuffers 1.1 released
It would be interesting to create a new java benchmark with your implementation.
-
Ask HN: Examples of Top C# Code?
Also worth checking out the gRPC benchmarks: https://github.com/LesnyRumcajs/grpc_bench/discussions/284
dotnet is up there with Rust.
What are some alternatives?
grpcurl - Like cURL, but for gRPC: Command-line tool for interacting with gRPC servers
eCAL - Please visit the new repository: https://github.com/eclipse-ecal/ecal
jmeter-grpc-plugin - A JMeter plugin supports load test gRPC
FlatBuffers - FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library
grpc-go - The Go language implementation of gRPC. HTTP/2 based RPC
gRPC - The C based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)
gRPC - The Java gRPC implementation. HTTP/2 based RPC
k6 - A modern load testing tool, using Go and JavaScript - https://k6.io
greeter-bpf - implementing gRPC GreeterServer in eBPF just for fun.
grpc_bench - Various gRPC benchmarks