poker VS poker-base

I wrote a Haskell version that includes two components:

A very efficient function to rank a set of Texas Hold’em hands.

A Monte Carlo situation that gives you the probability of winning each hand from any known amount of information.

It is available here: https://github.com/ghais/poker

The reason for excluding a 7-card evaluator is threefold - I have no imminent need for it (yet), I want to do so but haven't done it, and I'm hoping to accommodate ghais' work here: https://github.com/ghais/poker. I'm not sure whether he's active though, since it's been a couple of weeks since I posted an issue. If you have work you'd like to include please ping me, or we can discuss what architectural work would be required. I do, however, think that a 7-card evaluator might be best kept as a separate package. One reason is because the naming for an evaluator might heavily conflict with other applications. On the other hand, it would be easier to maintain in a single library - I'm very open to the discussion.

Some notable features of the library: - actively maintained with fast author response times - fully documented (no really - 100% haddock coverage with examples) - fully tested (100% coverage between doctests and tests) - un-opinionated. Your poker library is very almost certainly with poker-base. I would be happy to help anyone migrate :) If poker-base doesn’t work for your needs, please create an issue! - There are already 5-7 libraries based on poker-base. See readme for 3 examples - Support for ghc-8.6.5 through ghc 9.0.1 (and probably 9.2? - happy to accept a PR) Myself and u/circleglyph have spent the last three weeks combining brain masses to get a clean foundation for poker applications in Haskell. We are both quite happy with the result, but there is always much to be done - so anyone who wants to get involved, please do :) We are very responsive and happy to help anyone find stuff to do. If there are any features or improvements that you would like to see, please do create an issue - it is likely we are already working on it! A summary of some known missing features (including good first issues) can be found at our issue tracker. For those additions we are not currently working on, we will be more than happy to work with you on adding the feature to poker-base or creating a new library... Just create an issue!

You can find the code here: https://github.com/santiweight/poker