Poker Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to poker

pytudes

100 22,331 7.7 Jupyter Notebook poker VS pytudes

Python programs, usually short, of considerable difficulty, to perfect particular skills.
TexasSolver

44 1,551 4.3 C++ poker VS TexasSolver

🚀 A very efficient Texas Holdem GTO solver :spades::hearts::clubs::diamonds:
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
openmc

4 692 9.4 Python poker VS openmc

OpenMC Monte Carlo Code
poker-base

2 4 0.0 Haskell poker VS poker-base
PokerMonteCarloAPI

1 1 5.1 C# poker VS PokerMonteCarloAPI
poker-hand

1 3 0.0 Haskell poker VS poker-hand

Build and evaluate poker hands
poker-histories

1 0 0.0 Haskell poker VS poker-histories
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better poker alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to poker

poker reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of poker. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-14.

The Law of Large Numbers, or Why It Is a Bad Idea to Go to the Casino
5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 14 May 2023

I wrote a Haskell version that includes two components:
A very efficient function to rank a set of Texas Hold’em hands.
A Monte Carlo situation that gives you the probability of winning each hand from any known amount of information.
It is available here: https://github.com/ghais/poker
Looking for review: base Poker library
4 projects | /r/haskell | 3 Oct 2021

The reason for excluding a 7-card evaluator is threefold - I have no imminent need for it (yet), I want to do so but haven't done it, and I'm hoping to accommodate ghais' work here: https://github.com/ghais/poker. I'm not sure whether he's active though, since it's been a couple of weeks since I posted an issue. If you have work you'd like to include please ping me, or we can discuss what architectural work would be required. I do, however, think that a 7-card evaluator might be best kept as a separate package. One reason is because the naming for an evaluator might heavily conflict with other applications. On the other hand, it would be easier to maintain in a single library - I'm very open to the discussion.