ggml VS lm-evaluation-harness

git clone https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml cd ggml mkdir build cd build cmake .. make -j4 gpt-j ../examples/gpt-j/download-ggml-model.sh 6B

Cool. I was just learning about GGUF by creating my own parser for it based on the spec https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml/blob/master/docs/gguf.md (for educational purposes)

If you don't care about the details of how those model servers work, then something that abstracts out the whole process like LM Studio or Ollama is all you need.

However, if you want to get into the weeds of how this actually works, I recommend you look up model quantization and some libraries like ggml[1] that actually do that for you.

[1] https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml

Because the library is called ggml, but it supports gguf.

Apparently this guy like a bunch of others like https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml are implementing transformers from papers for people that want them. Pretty cool.

You can access it here: https://github.com/staghado/vit.cpp It has been added to the ggml library on GitHub: https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml

https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml

One note is that prompt ingestion is extremely slow on CPU compared to GPU. So short prompts are fine (as tokens can be streamed once the prompt is ingested), but long prompts feel extremely sluggish.

I did a quick run under profiler and on my AVX2-laptop the slowest part (>50%) was matrix multiplication (sgemm).

In current version of GGML if OpenBLAS is enabled, they convert matrices to FP32 before running sgemm.

If OpenBLAS is disabled, on AVX2 plaftorm they convert FP16 to FP32 on every FMA operation, which even worse (due to repetition). After that, both ggml_vec_dot_f16 and ggml_vec_dot_f32 took first place in profiler.

Source: https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml/blob/master/src/ggml.c#L10...

For those getting started, the easiest one click installer I've used is Nomic.ai's gpt4all: https://gpt4all.io/

This runs with a simple GUI on Windows/Mac/Linux, leverages a fork of llama.cpp on the backend and supports GPU acceleration, and LLaMA, Falcon, MPT, and GPT-J models. It also has API/CLI bindings.

I just saw a slick new tool https://ollama.ai/ that will let you install a llama2-7b with a single `ollama run llama2` command that has a very simple 1-click installer for Apple Silicon Mac (but need to build from source for anything else atm). It looks like it only supports llamas OOTB but it also seems to use llama.cpp (via Go adapter) on the backend - it seemed to be CPU-only on my MBA, but I didn't poke too much and it's brand new, so we'll see.

For anyone on HN, they should probably be looking at https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp and https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml directly. If you have a high-end Nvidia consumer card (3090/4090) I'd highly recommend looking into https://github.com/turboderp/exllama

For those generally confused, the r/LocalLLaMA wiki is a good place to start: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/wiki/guide/

I've also been porting my own notes into a single location that tracks models, evals, and has guides focused on local models: https://llm-tracker.info/

The easiest is to use vllm (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm) to run it on a Couple of A100's, and you can benchmark this using this library (https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)

Fair question.

Evaluate refers to the phase after training to check if the training is good.

Usually the flow goes training -> evaluation -> deployment (what you called inference). This project is aimed for evaluation. Evaluation can be slow (might even be slower than training if you're finetuning on a small domain specific subset)!

So there are [quite](https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench) [a](https://github.com/confident-ai/deepeval) [few](https://github.com/openai/evals) [frameworks](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness) working on evaluation, however, all of them are quite slow, because LLM are slow if you don't have infinite money. [This](https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass) one tries to speed up by parallelizing on multiple computers, but none of them takes advantage of the fact that many evaluation queries might be similar and all try to evaluate on all given queries. And that's where this project might come in handy.

I haven't run this yet, but I'm aware of Eleuther AI's evaluation harness EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness: A framework for few-shot evaluation of autoregressive language models. (github.com) and GPT-4 -based evaluations like lm-sys/FastChat: An open platform for training, serving, and evaluating large language models. Release repo for Vicuna and FastChat-T5. (github.com)

Updates: Just finished final evaluation (additional metrics) on https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness and have averaged the results for orca-mini-v2-13b. The average results for the Open LLM Leaderboard are not that great, compare to initial metrics. The average is now 0.54675 which put this model below then many other 13b out there.

Hey u/The-Bloke Appreciate the quants! What is the degradation on the some benchmarks. Have you seen https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness. 3-bit and 2-bit quant will really be pushing it. I don't see a ton of evaluation results on the quants and nice to see a before and after.

I am primarily looking for results of running the MMLU evaluation on modern large language models. I have been able to find some data here https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/master/results and will be asking them if/when, they can provide any additional data.

I evaluated orca_mini_v2_7b on a wide range of tasks using Language Model Evaluation Harness from EleutherAI.

There is the Language Model Evaluation Harness project which evaluates LLMs on over 200 tasks. HuggingFace has a leaderboard tracking performance on a subset of these tasks.

https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness

https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderb...