get-beam VS alpaca-lora

You should checkout https://beam.cloud (I'm the founder), it'll give you access to plenty of cloud GPU resources for training or inference.

Right now it's pretty hard to get GPU quota on AWS/GCP, so hopefully this is useful for you.

Cloudflare AI and Replicate are great for running off-the-shelf models, but anything custom is going to incur a 10+ minute cold start.

For running custom fine-tuned models on serverless, you could look into https://beam.cloud which is optimized for serving custom models with extremely fast cold start (I'm a little biased since I work there, but the numbers don't lie)

Serverless only works if the cold boot is fast. For context, my company runs a serverless cloud GPU product called https://beam.cloud, which we've optimized for fast cold start. We see Whisper in production cold start in under 10s (across model sizes). A lot of our users are running semi-real time STT, and this seems to be working well for them.

I’m Eli, and my co-founder and I built Beam to run workloads on serverless cloud GPUs with hot reloading, autoscaling, and (of course) fast cold start. You don’t need Docker or AWS to use it, and everyone who signs up gets 10 hours of free GPU credit to try it out.

Github with example apps and tutorials: https://github.com/slai-labs/get-beam/tree/main/examples

In this blog post, I want to make it as simple as possible to fine-tune the LLaMA 2 - 7B model, using as little code as possible. We will be using the Alpaca Lora Training script, which automates the process of fine-tuning the model and for GPU we will be using Beam.

Here is a example: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/blob/main/finetune.py

In this blog post, I want to make it as simple as possible to fine-tune the LLaMA 2 - 7B model, using as little code as possible. We will be using the Alpaca Lora Training script, which automates the process of fine-tuning the model and for GPU we will be using Beam.

Implement the code in Llama LoRA repo in a script we can run locally

Hi all - relatively new to GitHub / programming in general, and I wanted to try to set up Alpaca Lora locally. Following the guide here: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora

Follow up the popular work of u/tloen alpaca-lora, I wrapped the setup of alpaca_lora_4bit to add support for GPTQ training in form of installable pip packages. You can perform training and inference with multiple quantizations method to compare the results.

If instead you want to apply a LoRa to a pytorch model, a lot of people use this script to apply to LoRa to the 16 bit model and then quantize it with a GPTQ program afterwards https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/blob/main/export_hf_checkpoint.py

There are a few papers on watermarking LLM output, but from what I have seen they all use complex methods of detection to allow the watermark to go unseen by the end user, only to be detected by algorithm. I believe that a more overt system of watermarking might also be beneficial. One simple method that I have tried is character substitution. For this model, I LORA finetuned openlm-research/open_llama_3b on the alpaca_data_cleaned_archive.json dataset from https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora/ modified by replacing all instances of the "." character in the outputs with a "ι" The results are pretty good, with the correct the correct substitutions being generated by the model in most cases. It doesn't always work, but this was only a LORA training and for two epochs of 400 steps each, and 100% substitution isn't really required.

I am kind of new to finetuning LLM's and am not able to understand what this option exactly refers to. I guess it has the same meaning as the "train_on_inputs" parameter of alpacalora though.

Read the paper and also: https://github.com/tloen/alpaca-lora