gem_rbs_cli
RubyGems
| gem_rbs_cli | RubyGems | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 1 | 2,295 | |
| - | 0.2% | |
| 10.0 | 9.8 | |
| over 2 years ago | 4 days ago | |
| Ruby | Ruby | |
| - | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gem_rbs_cli
-
The future of rbs collection
At first I created a PoC with GitHub API v4 (GraphQL) because it could keep less API calls. However it was not a good idea. GitHub API requires an API token, so the user needs to prepare a Personal Access Token to use it for the local environment and CI. GitHub API v4 has another problem; It truncates large file contents. Therefore I needed combining GitHub API v4 and another API.
RubyGems
-
Phlex is the ruby way to build your views
However, let's examine a typical partial, such as the one from the . rubygems.org search show page
- Chrome considers gems to be dangerous?
- Rubygems.org Hacked?
- Rubygems.org marked by Chrome as an “unsafe site”
-
OOP vs. services for organizing business logic: is there a third way?
github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org (26k lines): Where Ruby gems are hosted.
-
RubyGems now requires MFA for owners of top gems
If anyone is looking to do some open source contributions on a mature, production Ruby on Rails site, I highly recommend contributing to the rubygems.org project. The code is extremely clean and the repo is very, very well run.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org
- Rubygems packages found carrying out dependency confusion research
-
Making popular Ruby packages more secure
RubyGems does have gem signing, but it's not widely used.
There's a proposal for a new "one button" approach using sigstore[0].
Other ecosystems are also looking at sigstore too, and a lot of us are cooperating in the OpenSSF Securing Software Repos WG [1]. Package signing is a regular topic of discussion and there are various efforts underway.
Disclosure: I am involved with both of these.
[0] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/pull/2944
[1] https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
- Due to a bug in the yank action, it was possible for any RubyGems.org user to remove and replace certain gems even if that user was not authorized to do so.
What are some alternatives?
rbs - Type Signature for Ruby
Bundler
gem_rbs_collection - A collection of RBS for gems.
gemdiff - Find source repositories for ruby gems. Open, compare, and update outdated gem versions
Gem in a Box - Really simple rubygem hosting
gemstash - A RubyGems.org cache and private gem server
passwordless - 🗝 Authentication for your Rails app without the icky-ness of passwords
SharpZipLib - #ziplib is a Zip, GZip, Tar and BZip2 library written entirely in C# for the .NET platform.
Open-Source-Ruby-and-Rails-Apps - Awesome Ruby and Rails Open Source applications 🌈
rubygems - Library packaging and distribution for Ruby.
PrismJS - Lightweight, robust, elegant syntax highlighting.