gcp-ingestion
bedrock
gcp-ingestion | bedrock | |
---|---|---|
2 | 57 | |
73 | 1,153 | |
- | 1.0% | |
8.7 | 9.8 | |
10 days ago | 5 days ago | |
Java | HTML | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gcp-ingestion
-
Each Firefox download has a unique identifier
I don't know how many folks will see this, and of those that do I don't expect many will necessarily be moved by what I say here. I'm going to say it anyways, however, and then I may never look at this thread again. I'm the person who designed the download token scheme that is discussed in this article, and, while I understand all of the concerns and suspicions, I believe that the way we designed this and the way we handle our telemetry data means that this is not the privacy violation some of you are claiming it is. Also, to be clear, I am speaking for myself here, these are my own thoughts and opinions, and I am not representing Mozilla in any official capacity.
So, a download token is a UUID associated with a unique download event. It gets generated when you click the 'download' link, added to the installer, and then passed through to the installed browser. It is returned to us in the telemetry pings that the browser sends back to our telemetry ingestion endpoints. When the download happens, on the server side we capture the download token and the GA session ID and store those in a table. There is nothing else stored in this table.
Having access to this table means that you can correlate the user's activity on the Mozilla website that GA provides with the telemetry data that Firefox sends us. The website activity contains URLs that the user visited, so we consider this "category 3" data (see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Data_Collection#Data_Collection_Cat...), quite sensitive. For that reason this table has highly restricted access, only a small number of individuals are able to get to it.
Access restrictions offer no protection against subpoenas, of course. But I believe you can safely maintain your anonymity by opting out of our telemetry gathering, because when you opt out of telemetry we delete all of the historical telemetry data we have collected for your Firefox profile. Everything, including all of the records that contain the download token.
If this happens, all we are left with is that original record with the download token and a GA session. The download token can no longer be correlated with your telemetry data, and we have no way of associating your Firefox installation with your GA session, not even under subpoena. And this is all assuming that you haven't blocked GA, or that you haven't specified 'Do Not Track' before visiting our website. If you've done either of those things, we won't have a GA session ID for you to begin with.
Oh, incidentally, we never store any IP addresses or other PII in our telemetry data. That all gets scrubbed during ingestion.
Again, I don't expect this to have much impact, but I'm sharing what I know to counter some of the more extreme claims that this removes the ability for Firefox users to remain anonymous.
Finally, we have the obvious question: Why we would even do this? Believe it or not, understanding your user base does actually have some value in serving that user base. For most of Firefox's existence, there has been no trustable feedback loop. Sure, folks out there in the world have opinions, and share them, but opinions differ, and anecdotes are not data. If one person thinks most users will like a particular change, and someone else thinks they won't, nobody can prove their point in any meaningful way. The folks making decisions about Firefox have been flying blind. And, as many of you in this thread have pointed out, it hasn't necessarily been going that well.
In Firefox's early years, there was lots of low hanging fruit, and the competition was a poorly maintained Internet Explorer, so it was easy to win a bunch of market share. Then Chrome came on the scene with their effectively limitless budget and famously data driven product process. We'll never match their budget, but we can try to make choices based on data instead of just letting whoever has the most organizational power decide. My team has spent the last few years building out a data infrastructure that we hope will support better decision making going forward while still trying to honor user privacy and choice. This is a tough balance to strike, and we're far from perfect, but we do our best.
You can learn about or data collection infrastructure and policies in great detail on our docs site (https://docs.telemetry.mozilla.org/index.html), and you can see nearly all of the code that handles our data ingestion and processing in our public repositories (https://github.com/mozilla/gcp-ingestion and https://github.com/mozilla/bigquery-etl).
-
Firefox Is the Only Alternative
I used to work on Mozilla's data platform. That stuff is all open source. See e.g. https://github.com/mozilla/gcp-ingestion/ for the ingestion pipeline, https://github.com/mozilla/bigquery-etl for queries/ETL, and https://github.com/mozilla/looker-spoke-default/ for looker model definitions for that data.
Also go read the docs at https://docs.telemetry.mozilla.org/. Those will give you insights into every way they use data.
I've never seen a company that's more open about their data usage.
bedrock
-
Before and after image slider in pure CSS
Because I use God's Own Browser, this all came together quickly and worked well. It looked, and behaved, just like one of the JavaScript switcharoos. Then I tested it in Chrome.
-
What URLs are used to update the browser
Allowing www.mozilla.org and ftp.mozilla.org also doesn't work. So far with those URLs it can detect that a new version is available and starts downloading with zero progress. ftp.mozilla.org at least allows me to manually download an installer but it would be nice to get auto updates working.
-
Naučite da programirate za 10 godina - Peter Norvig
If you want, put in four years at a college (or more at a graduate school). This will give you access to some jobs that require credentials, and it will give you a deeper understanding of the field, but if you don't enjoy school, you can (with some dedication) get similar experience on your own or on the job. In any case, book learning alone won't be enough. "Computer science education cannot make anybody an expert programmer any more than studying brushes and pigment can make somebody an expert painter" says Eric Raymond, author of The New Hacker's Dictionary. One of the best programmers I ever hired had only a High School degree; he's produced a lot of great software, has his own news group, and made enough in stock options to buy his own nightclub.
-
fuck ! casey anthony got away with murder !
www.mozilla.org
-
Is there a way we can donate?
In the past, the developer had encouraged users who wanted to give additional donations to instead donate to nonprofit organizations like the Mozilla Foundation or the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation).
-
Help trying to figure out what's wrong with my desktop?
It won't help in this case because they can't resolve the address www.mozilla.org, but there are certain encryption/auth protocols where if your time is out by around 5 minutes you'll fail to establish a connection. An example of this would be at work if you were trying to log in and your client system is either 10 minutes faster or slower than the Active Directory domain controller.
-
markdown sheet cheat
I'm a reference-style link
-
Microsoft will forcibly remove Internet Explorer from most Windows 10 PCs today
/boots up brand new Windows PC/ Welcome to Microsoft Edge! Let's get you star-... /www.mozilla.org/
-
How to access I2P in 13 Steps on Windows
Firefox Browser: Download from www.mozilla.org
-
How do I install Firebox with Ublock origin on my Microsoft surface pro 6?
The official site is https://www.mozilla.org/ I generally suggest to download the setup file from there since it is guaranteed to be the actual version. The one from the Microsoft store might be older. Either way Mozilla is the company that makes and maintains the Firefox browser. Ublock origin is an extension for the Firefox browser. To find extensions for Firefox open the main menu of the browser and scroll down until you see the word extensions. There you can search for ublock. Alternatively you can directly visit the website : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/extensions/
What are some alternatives?
gecko-dev - Read-only Git mirror of the Mercurial gecko repositories at https://hg.mozilla.org. How to contribute: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/contributing/contribution_quickref.html
firefox-user.js-tool - Interactive view, compare, and more for Firefox user.js (eg arkenfox/user.js) + about:config functions
brave-browser - Brave browser for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows.
privacytests.org - Source code for privacytests.org. Includes browser testing code and site rendering.
go-bouncer - A Go version of the redirector portion of bouncer.
browser
serenity - The Serenity Operating System 🐞
mehrzahl - Tagged template literals for singular/plural formatting
bigquery-etl - Bigquery ETL
github-readme-streak-stats - 🔥 Stay motivated and show off your contribution streak! 🌟 Display your total contributions, current streak, and longest streak on your GitHub profile README
Superstruct - A simple and composable way to validate data in JavaScript (and TypeScript).