SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more β
Bedrock Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to bedrock
-
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB β Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads. InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.
-
-
-
-
-
-
user.js
Firefox privacy, security and anti-tracking: a comprehensive user.js template for configuration and hardening
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
LibreOffice
Read-only LibreOffice core repo - no pull request (use gerrit instead https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/) - don't download zip, use https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/ instead (by LibreOffice)
-
privacytests.org
Source code for privacytests.org. Includes browser testing code and site rendering.
-
-
VideoLAN Client (VLC)
VLC media player - All pull requests are ignored, please use MRs on https://code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc
-
-
ONLYOFFICE
ONLYOFFICE Docs is a free collaborative online office suite comprising viewers and editors for texts, spreadsheets and presentations, forms and PDF, fully compatible with Office Open XML formats: .docx, .xlsx, .pptx and enabling collaborative editing in real time.
-
privacybadger
Privacy Badger is a browser extension that automatically learns to block invisible trackers.
-
-
-
-
-
github-readme-streak-stats
π₯ Stay motivated and show off your contribution streak! π Display your total contributions, current streak, and longest streak on your GitHub profile README
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
bedrock discussion
bedrock reviews and mentions
-
Unveiling the Mozilla Public License 2.0: A Deep Dive into Open Source Licensing and Fair Code Principles
Open source licenses have evolved over time. The Mozilla Public License was originally developed by the Mozilla Foundation with the goals of protecting developer contributions while permitting integration with commercial projects. As the open source movement grew in the early 2000s, many developers needed a license that balanced transparency and commercial interests. MPL 2.0 was rewritten to address ambiguities found in earlier versions. This evolution was driven largely by community feedback and legal debates on compatibility and enforcement.
-
Markdown for dummies
[Google Maps](https://www.google.com/maps) [Google link with title](https://www.google.com "Sample title text") [Google Link][case-insensitive reference text] [Reference to a repository file](../blob/master/LICENSE) [case-insensitive reference text]: https://www.mozilla.org
- Tell Mozilla: it's time to ditch Google
- Ask HN: With trust in Firefox gone, is Chrome-ish the only option?
- Mozilla's new Terms of Use causes confusion among Firefox users
-
Mozilla deletes promise to never sell Firefox data
Link directly to the Github commit: https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...
I can't say that this would surprise me, perhaps they are looking for alternate revenue streams in case Google cuts them out?
To HN: Will you be quitting firefox over this change, or is there simply no better place to leave for?
-
Mozilla Introducing 'Terms of Use' to Firefox
This commit looks particularly bad:
https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...
Notably, this was deleted on 2025-02-25 from the Firefox FAQ:
> Question
-
Mozilla owns information "you input through Firefox"
Only because the commit to remove it is yet to be merged.
https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...
-
Welcome to Ladybird, a independent web browser
I don't have any special insight on these events but I've seen that commit linked a lot.
From a pure optics point of view, it looks extremely bad but reading some of the comments, it sounds like that repo is basically a mirror of some upstream project where terms and conditions/faqs etc are stored as pseudo-structured data and that they're migrating parts of that repo to something other project?
I feel like a lot of context is missing but if I squint that seems to be what this comment is saying: https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...
Don't get me wrong, I love bagging on Mozilla as much as the next person but as extremely bad as it looks, I'm convinced that it's literally what it looks like?
-
Mozilla's New Terms of Use Are Out of Step with Firefox's Direct Competition
https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...
Any phrases similar to "we donβt sell access to your data" have been removed.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 16 May 2025
Stats
mozilla/bedrock is an open source project licensed under Mozilla Public License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of bedrock is HTML.