fx-autoconfig
firejail
fx-autoconfig | firejail | |
---|---|---|
101 | 139 | |
150 | 5,449 | |
- | - | |
8.1 | 9.7 | |
about 2 months ago | 4 days ago | |
JavaScript | C | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fx-autoconfig
-
Pinned tabs on NavBar... doable?
I'm using your https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/fx-autoconfig
-
How to run custom JS in moz-extension:// page?
Basically what the title says. I have some JS code I'd like to automatically run in a specific moz-extension:// page. In particular, I'm interested in Sidebery's moz-extension://*/sidebar/index.html, but I suspect the answer would be the same for any page. I tried writing a userscript with MrOtherGuy's fx-autoconfig, but to no avail: I can successfully run userscripts in chrome://browser/content/browser.xhtml, but if I add
-
Yet another same request: Draggable buttons
If not possible with CSS, will JS work making them draggable? I found several JS draggable buttons at https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/fx-autoconfig
- some javascript code
-
is there a way to get the url link of "Restart Firefox" from 'about:restartrequired' and make it into a bookmark?
copy config.js from https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/fx-autoconfig/tree/master/program > C:\Program Files\Mozilla\Firefox
-
Mozilla reaffirms that Firefox will continue to support current content blockers
UI customization is fortunately still alive in the wake of XUL extensions.
A /r/firefoxcss mod has a wonderful collection of code snippets that they maintain, which you can browse here: https://mrotherguy.github.io/firefox-csshacks/ and they created a userChrome.js loader here: https://github.com/MrOtherGuy/fx-autoconfig
My favorite customization repository is https://github.com/aminomancer/uc.css.js - which really tests the limits of what is and isn't possible with userChrome.css and .js. My favorite feature is the implementation vertical tabs, without the use of extensions.
Some legacy extensions are maintained and can be found here: https://github.com/xiaoxiaoflood/firefox-scripts/tree/master... (although you will need to use xiaoxiaoflood's userChrome.js loader AFAIK).
Honorable mention goes to the Firefox CSS Store, which can be found here: https://trickypr.github.io/FirefoxCSS-Store.github.io/
Moving to WebExtensions was the logical choice for Firefox, technical/security reasons aside, as they are not alienating extension developers that target Chromium-based browsers.
Yes, they alienated their own extension developers. Yes, they could've handled the transition better, and worked harder towards supporting some of the many APIs/functionalities that extension developers needed (or still need) for their extensions to work in the WebExtensions ecosystem. I myself was quite mad for a very long time at how they handled the switch, but I think overall it's been a success - my own personal feelings aside.
-
Why is my userContent.css refusing to apply?
Run it as userChrome.js
-
How do I hide the menu button when the menu bar is visible? (Firefox 100)
I'm currently using a customized version of Aris-t2's CustomCSSforFx theme, along with /u/It_Was_The_Other_Guy's fx-autoconfig loader for JavaScript. My setup uses the option to put the application menu button in the title bar. In the versions that had this as standard, the menu button disappeared when the menu bar was shown. Is there a way to recreate this with either CSS or JavaScript?
-
Help Editing Min/Max/Close Buttons For Firefox 100.0.2
Why Use CSS Alone Though
- Code to change color of Tab based on URL - works but needs to be more efficient
firejail
-
Sandboxing All the Things with Flatpak and BubbleBox
bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.
Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.
If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
-
Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.
I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:
```
-
Toolship: A (More) Secure Workstation
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/
Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.
This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...
TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.
Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.
-
Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).
Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":
- Firejail: Light featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Do, or do not. There is no try
Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc
-
Strange times make for strange friends...
What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?
What are some alternatives?
Zotero-Dark-Theme - userChrome.css file for a Zotero dark theme. Suggestions for improvements are welcome.
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
firefox-csshacks - Collection of userstyles affecting the browser
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
WebNowPlaying - A NowPlaying like plugin for rainmeter built for getting music info from websites
bubblejail - Bubblewrap based sandboxing for desktop applications
FirefoxPWA - A tool to install, manage and use Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) in Mozilla Firefox [Moved to: https://github.com/filips123/PWAsForFirefox]
Flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions
web-ext - A command line tool to help build, run, and test web extensions
yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning
Firefox-UI-Fix - 🦊 I respect proton UI and aim to improve it.
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.