futswirl VS pareas

Compare futswirl vs pareas and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
futswirl pareas
1 1
6 280
- -
4.8 4.1
4 months ago 2 months ago
Futhark Futhark
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

futswirl

Posts with mentions or reviews of futswirl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-31.

pareas

Posts with mentions or reviews of pareas. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-19.
  • GPU Programming: When, Why and How?
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Jun 2023
    Compared to Halide:

    * Futhark does not expose a scheduling language that gives you precise control over code generation. This is probably the main selling point of Halide.

    * Futhark has a much broader focus than Halide, which is mainly oriented towards image processing. Futhark wants to support arbitrary data parallel computation. E.g. see this compiler written in Futhark: https://github.com/Snektron/pareas

    Compared to Sycl:

    * Futhark is a non-embedded language that is more high level than Sycl. The goals are similar in the sense that both systems to try make (data) parallel programming more accessible. The vision behind Futhark is that the conventional functional programming vocabulary is actually a pretty good fit for parallelism, and that an aggressively optimising compiler can reduce or eliminate the overhead of abstraction. I don't think Sycl is as focused on high levels of abstraction, but rather focuses on being a relatively low-level portable programming interface.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing futswirl and pareas you can also consider the following projects:

HarkDB - Multi-backend GPU query engine written with Futhark

futhark-metal - :boom::computer::boom: A data-parallel functional programming language

hastl - HaSTL: A fast GPU implementation of STL decomposition with missing values and support for both CUDA and OpenCL

diving-beet - A port of Falling Turnip from Haskell to Futhark and Go :car: :boom:

Ark - ArkScript is a small, fast, functional and scripting language for C++ projects

futhark-mode - Emacs major mode for editing Futhark programs

Feral - Feral programming language reference implementation

bfast - GPU Implementation for BFAST

jank - A Clojure dialect hosted on LLVM with native C++ interop