pareas

GPU-accelerated compiler (by Snektron)

Pareas Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to pareas

  1. futhark

    56 pareas VS futhark

    :boom::computer::boom: A data-parallel functional programming language

  2. Nutrient

    Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers. Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.

    Nutrient logo
  3. futhark-metal

    :boom::computer::boom: A data-parallel functional programming language

  4. HarkDB

    1 pareas VS HarkDB

    Multi-backend GPU query engine written with Futhark

  5. futswirl

    Fun with IFS fractals :boom:

  6. Ark

    21 pareas VS Ark

    ArkScript is a small, fast, functional and scripting language for C++ projects (by ArkScript-lang)

  7. Feral

    Feral programming language reference implementation

  8. jank

    38 pareas VS jank

    The native Clojure dialect hosted on LLVM

  9. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better pareas alternative or higher similarity.

pareas discussion

Log in or Post with

pareas reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of pareas. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-19.
  • GPU Programming: When, Why and How?
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Jun 2023
    Compared to Halide:

    * Futhark does not expose a scheduling language that gives you precise control over code generation. This is probably the main selling point of Halide.

    * Futhark has a much broader focus than Halide, which is mainly oriented towards image processing. Futhark wants to support arbitrary data parallel computation. E.g. see this compiler written in Futhark: https://github.com/Snektron/pareas

    Compared to Sycl:

    * Futhark is a non-embedded language that is more high level than Sycl. The goals are similar in the sense that both systems to try make (data) parallel programming more accessible. The vision behind Futhark is that the conventional functional programming vocabulary is actually a pretty good fit for parallelism, and that an aggressively optimising compiler can reduce or eliminate the overhead of abstraction. I don't think Sycl is as focused on high levels of abstraction, but rather focuses on being a relatively low-level portable programming interface.

Stats

Basic pareas repo stats
1
339
4.1
11 months ago

Sponsored
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io