The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fsql
Posts with mentions or reviews of fsql.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-20.
sd
Posts with mentions or reviews of sd.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-20.
-
Fd: A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'
https://github.com/chmin/sd: "sd uses regex syntax that you already know from JavaScript and Python. Forget about dealing with quirks of sed or awk - get productive immediately."
It would be interesting to test the ~1.5GB of JSON the author uses for the benchmark against sed, but there are no details on how many files nor what those files contain.
When trying something relatively small and simple, sd appears to be slower than sed. It also appears to require more memory. Maybe others will have different results.
sh # using dash not bash
What are some alternatives?
When comparing fsql and sd you can also consider the following projects:
sqlitefs - sqlite as a filesystem