FreeRADIUS VS nitter

FreeRADIUS WiFi authentication server

It needs to be supported at your edge switching. Most vendors support it. You usually just need some kind of RADIUS server. FreeRADIUS is one of the better options.

You can link it back to your Windows AD account with Windows NPS, or you can use some free Radius or TACACS software package like FreeRadius, https://freeradius.org/

In WorkSpaces, the only way to enable MFA is through a Radius server integrated either with an on-premises AD or an AWS Managed AD. This approach will allow you to use authentication apps like Google Authenticator to first authenticate the username and password against your Active Directory and the Radius Server will be responsible to authenticate the One-Time Password (OTP) generated by Google Authenticator. One of the open-source Radius software that can be used is FreeRadius.

I wonder why your sys admins didn't try FreeRADIUS. It ships with detailed config examples also for using LDAP for authentication.

You can setup an freeradius server(or 2) to handle the authentication requests (https://freeradius.org/)

The last I knew, the client server(s) were running Apache HTTPD on Fedora 35. We use a RADIUS server for centralized authentication for the web-based applications on those servers. I believe it is using FreeRADIUS but that is a complete guess.

Don't use Youtube without going through a proxy like Invidious [1] or Newpipe

Don't use {site} Search without going through a proxy like SearxNG [2]

Don't use TwiXXer without going through a proxy like Nitter - this has gotten more difficult lately but it still works as long as you feed the daemon some registered accounts. Video does not work at the moment but that seems to be fixable.

Don't use Reddit without going through a proxy like libreddit [4]

Start noticing the pattern? Maybe it is time to start producing promotional posters:

The only thing to come between you and ADS could be a proxy / ADS. I'ts just not worth the risk

ADS / New rules for a sane net / Sane net protects you, your partner and your community

A proxy here and a filter there, ADS nowhere

The more you tighten your grip, ${site}, the more viewers will slip through your fingers

[1] https://github.com/iv-org/invidious

[2] https://github.com/searxng/searxng

[3] https://github.com/zedeus/nitter

[4] https://github.com/libreddit/libreddit

https://nitter.esmailelbob.xyz/liuzhuang1234/status/17601959...

(bit of trial and error from https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances)

I assume this is why Nitter got slammed and is on the verge of breaking.

https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1154

The creator of the project left this comment an hour ago:

https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1155#issuecomment-19...

(HN removed the deep link to the specific comment from the title)

Most of the time you can just replace twitter.com with nitter.net or nitter.it but when these instances are down or blocked you can use other instances listed here: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances

But as the other commenter said Libredirect is the way to go: https://libredirect.github.io/

Use a Youtube proxy like Invidious [1], problem solved and you get to subscribe to channels without telling the Beast about your interests. Add Sponsorblock (which supports Invidious) to get rid of any in-stream advertising which remains and you'll be transported back to those hallowed times of yore when men were men, women were women and advertising was something you found in newspapers. Youtube will try to make this harder just like Xitter is trying to make it harder to use proxies like Nitter [2].

[1] https://github.com/iv-org/invidious

[2] https://github.com/zedeus/nitter

njal.la restored nitter.net, and replied with their reasons: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/1150#issuecomment-18...

tbh I can totally understand why they acted this way.