format
lit
format | lit | |
---|---|---|
19 | 141 | |
1,904 | 17,575 | |
0.8% | 1.3% | |
9.4 | 9.4 | |
3 days ago | 7 days ago | |
C# | TypeScript | |
MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
format
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
C# has https://github.com/dotnet/format but because C# is, well, not JS, the importance of linting is far less significant. Instead, there are hundreds of out-of-box analyzers that highlight problematic patterns or likely mistakes in the code and there are even more that you can enable through extensions (like Roslynator) or through packages that are 'dotnet add package' away.
On the package management - it couldn't be more different between Java and C# and it's incorrect to compare the two. .NET has few if any issues of the former.
-
Enhancing Your Open-Source Project with Static Analysis Tools
In my project, I incorporated a source code formatter provided by the dotnet framework. I also added .editorconfig file to the root directory of my project. This file defines formatting rules, such as indent style and indent size, ensuring consistency throughout the codebase.
-
Rider - Formatting across projects
However: It would appear that dotnet has a lot of extension values for editorconfig - does Rider support all of those? Some of those? Is there documentation of any extension?
-
100% deterministic c# formatter
Like this post explains: https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/879
-
Dotnet, C#, code format on JetBrain IDE Rider
Dotnet Format
-
Enforcing .NET code style rules at compile time
Oh, I'm using .net format. https://github.com/dotnet/format . I will take a look at csharpier to compare both :)
- Migrating from JS/TS ecosystem to Blazor
-
Which linters are you using for CI environments?
- dotnet format but this is not a linter I think?
-
[Avançado] Criando templates customizados em C#
Para formatar seu código instale o dotnet format e execute o seguinte comando:
-
How do you format?
dotnet format does not break lines when they get too long, or collapse lines if they are too short and could be fit on the same line. See https://github.com/dotnet/format/issues/246. Another way to say it - no matter where you put linebreaks in a given code file, csharpier will produce the same output. dotnet format would produce a different output based on where current line breaks exist.
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
-
Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
https://github.com/lit/lit/tree/main/packages/labs/virtualiz...
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
What are some alternatives?
csharpier - CSharpier is an opinionated code formatter for c#.
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
omnisharp-vscode - Official C# support for Visual Studio Code [Moved to: https://github.com/dotnet/vscode-csharp]
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
CodeMaid - CodeMaid is an open source Visual Studio extension to cleanup and simplify our C#, C++, F#, VB, PHP, PowerShell, JSON, XAML, XML, ASP, HTML, CSS, LESS, SCSS, JavaScript and TypeScript coding.
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
StyleCopAnalyzers - An implementation of StyleCop rules using the .NET Compiler Platform
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
prettier - Prettier is an opinionated code formatter.
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
dotnet-full-framework-ci-sandbox - This repository aims to show how to create GitHub Actions to: Build and Test a .Net Full Framework Web API project; Check the code formatting (.NET / C#); Run SonarQube code static analysis.
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.