flycheck
On the fly syntax checking for GNU Emacs (by flycheck)
slime
The Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs (by slime)
Our great sponsors
| flycheck | slime | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 14 | |
| 2,384 | 1,851 | |
| 0.9% | 1.8% | |
| 9.0 | 8.2 | |
| 6 days ago | 3 days ago | |
| Emacs Lisp | Common Lisp | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
flycheck
Posts with mentions or reviews of flycheck.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-04.
-
Eask: v0.8.x released
So for correction to myself, the issue isn't regarding 3rd-party software. Is weather the software work great on each OS. Regarding Python vs Node.js, you can see the thread in flycheck/#1957.
-
Flycheck unavailable?
Not sure if you tried using google. https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck lists a direct link to installation instructions.
- Integrating ruff-lsp with emacs (python)
-
Emacs 29.1 is going to be released in 2023 spring with built-in LSP support (Eglot)
Good luck with that.
-
What does your workflow look like on Linux?
flycheck for syntax checking if you feel like it (some LSP packages overlap with or use this for similar features)
-
Is there something similar to remote containers in emacs?
Second this. Also FYI, https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/pull/1842
slime
Posts with mentions or reviews of slime.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-22.
- Emacs 28 can not run Slime
-
Anyone know why newlines get randomly inserted when printing a list with format on emacs + slime?
Try https://github.com/slime/slime/commit/e6a71c725c8e13d7d4c40e6a6fa7b696575a8d01
-
So i wanna learn Common Lisp
With emacs your two choices are either SLIME or SLY. Slime is a good place to start - it's rock solid. Once you get moving you can make a judgement call on whether or not SLY has features you'd like over what SLIME has available.
-
Common Lisp vs Racket
To provide a bit more context, most of SLIME is just Common Lisp code (https://github.com/slime/slime), with a bunch of Emacs Lisp code alongside to support interfacing with Emacs. But you don't need that Emacs Lisp code to take advantage of almost all of the functionality SLIME provides. For instance, if you want to know who-calls a function, there's some command in emacs to do it, but all that command is doing is just a bit of elisp code which sends a message to Swank (a server running inside Common Lisp) and Swank invokes some native CL code to figure that out and return the results, then finally a bit of elisp code presents the results in some way. Vim can do the same thing just fine with vimscript/python (what the Slimv plugin uses) or otherwise, the bulk of the work in figuring out the list of callers of some function is done by the CL code (and CL implementation itself).
-
What does your workflow look like on Linux?
SLIME or SLY for Common Lisp (if you want to work with it), Geiser for various Schemes
-
slime-pop-find-definition-stack not working
That's rather new, https://github.com/slime/slime/commit/789584a7acb15747678fa62a8fcfc8d1187be867 is probably about that.
- Offline Hyperspec? html, texinfo, org, something?
-
Slime
With that headline on HN, I was expecting this: https://common-lisp.net/project/slime/
-
Python REPL-driven development in Emacs
SLIME or Sly for Common Lisp, Geiser for most Scheme implementations, or racket-mode for Racket?
-
Is there a possibility to have a master stack in bspwm like in dwm?
For example, some people that are Common Lisp programmers, but don't use GNU Emacs, may decide to use GNU Emacs because of the slime-mode workflow.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing flycheck and slime you can also consider the following projects:
doom-emacs - An Emacs framework for the stubborn martian hacker [Moved to: https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs]
sly - Sylvester the Cat's Common Lisp IDE
docker-tramp.el - TRAMP integration for docker containers
portacle - A portable common lisp development environment
docker.el - Manage docker from Emacs.
paip-lisp - Lisp code for the textbook "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming"
kibit-runner
hebigo - 蛇語(HEH-bee-go): An indentation-based skin for Hissp.
docker-compose-mode - Major mode for editing docker-compose files
bsp-layout - Manage layouts in bspwm (tall and wide)
flycheck-title - show flycheck errors in the frame title
common-lisp-jupyter - A Common Lisp kernel for Jupyter along with a library for building Jupyter kernels.