flow VS Joda-Time

It's not as popular as typescript but not dead, it's consistently active [0] for a decade.

[0] https://github.com/facebook/flow/graphs/contributors

One alternative that I found was flow, thought haven't used it. There is a bevy of languages that transpiles to JS, though some seemingly lost their attention over time. Can the bridge to WASM contribute to this or is that digressing from the topic?

I think you are mistaking Flow unmaintained for Flow actively maintained.

Hack and Flow are also written in OCaml.

So... you're referring to flow?

It seems like Facebook doesn't have problem with releasing open source project [0] while keeping centralised control over it.

[0] https://github.com/facebook/flow

Facebook uses OCaml professionally, for [Flow](https://github.com/facebook/flow), their typechecker for JavaScript, and [Pyre](https://github.com/facebook/pyre-check), their typechecker for Python.

Not a big deal. That should be it, right? Not too soon! Turns out clj-time is a wrapper of Joda Time and the project's README says:

>> Note that boost is also not the C++ standard library.

I know, but many components that are now in the C++ standard library were previously in Boost or were heavily influenced by / inspired by Boost:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59912393/boost-libraries...

Similar events also happened in Java 8 with the Joda time library:

https://www.joda.org/joda-time/

>> serde's main maintainer is also a member of the libs team, so it being moved into the standard library meaning more maintenance doesn't really make sense to me.

I did not know that.

I was just using serde as an example of a widely-used crate that feels essential enough to be included in the Rust standard library.

At what point does a third-party crate become so useful that it might be considered for inclusion in the Rust standard library?

Is there a process for adding crates to the Rust standard library?

If so, how do such crates get nominated and approved?

I have one, and only one, suggestion for u/spez. To throw the ball in Christian's court, make him a genuine offer to work at reddit on getting your own iOS app based on apollo. Similar to how Sun threw in the towel to develop decent date time handling in Java and backed JSR-310, involving the author of joda time.

But it does not say "nuclear" projects. For a comparison, our CEO started in my position and worked their way up. So they know the technical aspects of my job and don't need a slide on why we're using joda-time instead of the built-in Date library in the JDK.

You can look back at the notes under JSR-310 and Joda-Time, projects that improved upon Java's time handling prior to Java 8.

For Java 7 you can use Joda Time. It was developed by the same person who was one of the developers of the Java 8 Date Time Api.

Many languages, frameworks and libraries are open source. For example, Golang, React, Joda-time

Back when I used Java, it was Joda-Time but it seems they are recommending java.time instead.

For some background: Java 8 time package is basically just JodaTime. JodaTime was used in almost all pre-8 projects because the pre-8 date/time API in Java is just horrible. They got it completely wrong twice even.