flix
Pipefish
flix | Pipefish | |
---|---|---|
11 | 36 | |
2,057 | 138 | |
1.0% | - | |
9.9 | 9.2 | |
2 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Scala | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
flix
-
Learn Datalog Today
you can use Datalig within Flix https://flix.dev/
-
The Flix Programming Language
> recently added support for package management
Are there any [plans for] supply chain attack mitigations?
Naively searching, I find https://github.com/flix/flix/issues/4380#issuecomment-123641... (Proposed Principle: A package can be declared as "safe") and https://github.com/flix/flix/issues/2837 (Add capability-safety to polymorphic effects?) the latter closed with working on something related to this https://github.com/flix/flix/issues/3000 (The Road to Algebraic Effects).
- Java 21 makes me like Java again
-
Alternatives to scala FP
I don't know that it's one-to-one in terms of features, but I've been impressed with the Flix language, also on the jvm: https://flix.dev/ .
- Programming in Standard ML [pdf]
-
Ask HN: What is new in Algorithms / Data Structures these days?
You might be interested in Flix which has first-class Datalog program values:
https://flix.dev/
https://doc.flix.dev/fixpoints.html
(I am one of the developers of Flix)
-
What the imperative shell of an Functional Core/Imperative Shell language looks like
I like it. Modern languages that distinguish between pure and impure programs like Flix, Koka, and Effekt do so on the type level instead of syntactically. This has three advantages:
-
[Q] Alternative languages; which one do you use?
I work almost 100% in Scala because it has the most advanced functional features (proper pattern matching, higher-kinded types, typeclasses, ...) and very powerful metaprogramming abilities, while being compatible with the Java OO model as long as you consume Java libraries (the other way around can be tricky, Kotlin is much better there). Only Flix takes it further but it's still an immature project.
- Seeking Language Project to Join
Pipefish
-
Charm 0.4: a different kind of functional language
Charm is a language where Functional-Core/Imperative-Shell is the language paradigm and not just something you can choose to do in Python or Ruby or PHP or JS or your favorite lightweight dynamic language. Because of the sort of use-cases that this implies, it didn't seem suitable to write another Lisp or another ML, so I got to do some completely blank-slate design. This gives us Charm, a functional language which has no pattern-matching, no currying, no monads, no macros, no homoiconicity, nor a mathematically interesting type system — but which does have purity, referential transparency, immutability, multiple dispatch, a touch of lazy evaluation, REPL-oriented development, hotcoding, microservices … and SQL interop because everyone's going to want that.
-
Charm 0.4: now with ... stability. And reasons why you should care about it.
I think it's fair to call this a language announcement because although I've been posting here about this project for a loooong time, I've finally gotten to what I'm going to call a "working prototype" as defined here. Charm has a complete core language, it has libraries and tooling, it has some new and awesome features of its own. So … welcome to Charm 0.4! Installation instructions are here. It has a language tutorial/manual/wiki, besides lots of other documentation; people who just want to dive straight in could look at the tutorial Writing an Adventure Game in Charm.
-
Programming in Plain Language?
In my own language there is some syntactic flexibility but the only thing that describe pretty table could mean would be the second of the possibilities above; the first would be expressed by describe prettyTable and the third by describe PRETTY, table. This makes it more readable from the point of view of a coder, and who else is going to want to read it, my mom?
-
Embedding other languages in Charm: a draft
I've been trying to think of a way of doing this which is simple and consistent and which can be extended by other people, so if someone wanted to embed e.g. Prolog in Charm they could do it without any help from me.
-
Lazy Let: A Cheap Way and Easy Way to Add Lazyness
Charm does this for declaration of local constants in functions (there are no local variables in functions). So for example if you wanted to write the Collatz function this way (which you wouldn't, it's just a minimal example) then you could do so without worrying about a computational explosion:
-
[OC] Median yearly salaries in the US for all programming languages with more than 200 respondents in the StackOverflow Developer Survey
I guess it's time for me to put aside my exploration of Charm and set up a collaboration with my son the lyricist.
-
Global and local variables, a choice of evils
In fact that's how a lot of Charm programs end up getting written, because you want to pass a whole bundle of stuff to the functions. For example.
-
What the imperative shell of an Functional Core/Imperative Shell language looks like
No, it's "shell" as in "shell of the code". The idea is that the imperative bits of the language, the bits that do the mutation of state and the IO, can can call lovely pure referentially transparent functions. But functions can't call commands (otherwise by definition they wouldn't be pure). So all your imperative-ness is reduced to about 1% of your code which lives right at the top of your call stack --- the "imperative shell" of your code. See [here](https://github.com/tim-hardcastle/Charm/blob/main/examples/adv.ch) for an example. The "imperative shell" is the main function --- all 13 lines of it --- and everything everywhere else is pure and immutable.
-
What are some cool things you've built using your own language?
I'm not sure what counts as cool. It's just dogfooding at the moment. I did a bunch of other languages (only the BASIC and the Forth are up to date with the current version of the language I think), and I did a tiny adventure game (and used it as the basis for a tutorial).
- Langception VIII: Ourobouros — I wrote Forth in Charm again
What are some alternatives?
ezno - A JavaScript compiler and TypeScript checker written in Rust with a focus on static analysis and runtime performance
utop - Universal toplevel for OCaml
lwjgl3ify - A mod to run Minecraft 1.7.10 using LWJGL3 and Java 17, 19, 20
sprig - Useful template functions for Go templates.
highfleet-ship-opt - A c/c++ module and python extensions for automatic optimization of Highfleet ship modules. Try it live at https://hfopt.jodavaho.io
butter - A tasty language for building efficient software. WIP
lamini
wyvern - The Wyvern programming language.
Language-suggestions - Collecting ideas for a new .NET language that could replace C#
subtex - Lightweight latex-like language for authoring books
egglog - egraphs + datalog!
Skript - Skript is a Bukkit plugin which allows server admins to customize their server easily, but without the hassle of programming a plugin or asking/paying someone to program a plugin for them.