flatpak-docs
Flatpak documentation (by flatpak)
snapstore
Minimalist Snap Store has been remade! (by gjsman)
| flatpak-docs | snapstore | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | |
| 76 | 11 | |
| - | - | |
| 7.8 | 10.0 | |
| 6 days ago | over 5 years ago | |
| reStructuredText | Python | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
flatpak-docs
Posts with mentions or reviews of flatpak-docs.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-07.
-
Own Flatpaks?
You can install flatpak-builder on SteamDeck with flatpak install org.flatpak.Builder. After that, you can follow the official documentation. Just use flatpak run org.flatpak.Builder instead of flatpak-builder .
-
Canonical should ditch Snap, embrace Flatpak and improve APT
Here's the PR: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-docs/pull/345 And the issue: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-docs/issues/342
snapstore
Posts with mentions or reviews of snapstore.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-07.
-
Why all the hate for Ubuntu and snap etc
Why should I be required to disprove your conspiracy theory? Here's one; took me three seconds of googling. https://github.com/gjsman/snapstore.
-
Canonical should ditch Snap, embrace Flatpak and improve APT
However, it looks like someone else is trying to do it with a current snapd, although you still can’t install from it.
-
Official Firefox Snap performance improvements
look here is a github for a non-launchpad based snap store. set it up, go crazy. https://github.com/gjsman/snapstore
-
Red Hat donates $10,000 to OBS Studio, Flatpak to be official for Linux
Your use of "optional" should be taken with a huge grain of salt, and THAT is what I'm getting at. This is why there are small third-party devs who have to pick-up the slack for Canonical with projects like these. That's just silly in my opinion.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing flatpak-docs and snapstore you can also consider the following projects:
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
ltt-linux-challenge-issues - A list of issues Linus and Luke experienced during the LTT Linux Daily Driver Challenge
com.vscodium.codium
apt-rollback
transactional-update - Atomic updates for Linux operating systems
ubuntu-touch - A simple and beautiful mobile OS for everyone! This repository is for Ubuntu Touch issue tracking. It does not contain any code used to create Ubuntu Touch.
kebe - Project Kebe is the open-source Snap Store implementation.
waydroid - Waydroid uses a container-based approach to boot a full Android system on a regular GNU/Linux system like Ubuntu.
Linux-tools - A few Linux tools and useful scripts.
flatpak-docs vs podman
snapstore vs ltt-linux-challenge-issues
flatpak-docs vs ltt-linux-challenge-issues
snapstore vs com.vscodium.codium
flatpak-docs vs apt-rollback
snapstore vs transactional-update
flatpak-docs vs ubuntu-touch
snapstore vs kebe
flatpak-docs vs transactional-update
snapstore vs apt-rollback
flatpak-docs vs waydroid
snapstore vs Linux-tools