flagger
rook
flagger | rook | |
---|---|---|
14 | 51 | |
4,735 | 11,931 | |
0.7% | 0.6% | |
8.7 | 9.9 | |
8 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
flagger
- A K8s progressive delivery tool
-
Progressive Delivery on AKS: A Step-by-Step Guide using Flagger with Istio and FluxCD
Flagger
-
API release strategies with API Gateway
Where appropriate, canary releases are an excellent option, as the percentage of traffic exposed to the canary is highly controlled. The trade-off is that the system must have good monitoring in place to be able to quickly identify an issue and roll back if necessary (which can be automated). This guide shows you how to use Apache APISIX and Flagger to quickly implement a canary release solution.
-
GitOps using Flux and Flagger
What is Flagger? Flagger is a Progressive Delivery tool that automates the release process for applications running on Kubernetes. Under the hood, both tools are built on top of a modular GitOps toolkit. It is the main reason why Flagger compliments Flux.
- RollingUpdate but with testing the new pods first for a few minutes
-
Interesting tools?
flagger: Automated canary using istio/linkerd
-
How to rebalance underutilized nodes with CA without single replica Pod downtime?
I would suggest trying a-b deployment in this case using flagger. It will spin up a new instance and gradually rotate out old ones. Maybe that can be helpful in this weird situation :)
-
argo-rollouts VS flagger - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 25 Jan 2022
ArgoRollouts offers Canary and BlueGreen deployment strategies for Kubernetes Pods. It's a drop-in replacement for the v1.Deployment object. Flagger is similar what it offers, extending Kubernetes to support Canary and BlueGreen deployment strategies.
-
How do you implement blue/green deployments ?
Check https://argoproj.github.io/argo-rollouts/ and https://flagger.app/
- ISO kubernetes tool or operator that automatically rolls over to a backup repo on failures
rook
-
Ceph: A Journey to 1 TiB/s
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff.
First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes.
For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines.
Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS).
And you do need decent networking connectivity - I think that's the main thing people think of, when they think of high hardware requirements for Ceph. Ideally 10Gbe at the minimum - although more if you want higher performance - there can be a lot of network traffic, particularly with things like backfill. (25Gbps if you can find that gear cheap for homelab - 50Gbps is a technological dead-end. 100Gbps works well).
But honestly, for a homelab, a cheap mini PC or NUC with 10Gbe will work fine, and you should get acceptable performance, and it'll be good for learning.
You can install Ceph directly on bare-metal, or if you want to do the homelab k8s route, you can use Rook (https://rook.io/).
Hope this helps, and good luck! Let me know if you have any other questions.
-
Running stateful workloads on Kubernetes with Rook Ceph
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case of a disaster.
-
People who run Nextcloud in Docker: Where do you store your data/files? In a Docker volume, or on a remote server/NAS?
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself.
-
Rook/Ceph with VM nodes on research cluster?
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:
-
Asking for recommendation on remote Kubernetes storage for a small cluster and databases
Have you looked at Rook?
-
Want advice on planned evolution: k3os/Longhorn --> Talos/Ceph, plus Consul and Vault
I've briefly run ceph in an external mode, you can actually use a rook deployment to manage it (sort of). Here is the documentation for doing that. For me it didn't pass my testing phase because I need better networking equipment before I can try that.
-
ATARI is still alive: Atari Partition of Fear
This article explains the data corruption issue happened in Rook in 2021. The root cause lies in an unexpected place and can also occurs in all Ceph environment. It's interesting that Rook had started to encounter this problem recently even though this problem has existed for a long time. It's due to a series of coincidences. I wrote this article because the word "Atari" used in a non-historical context in 2021.
-
How to Deploy and Scale Strapi on a Kubernetes Cluster 2/2
Rook (this is a nice article for Rook NFS)
-
Running on-premise k8s with a small team: possible or potential nightmare?
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc
-
My completely automated Homelab featuring Kubernetes
I've dealt with a lot of issues that are very close to just unplugging a node. Unfortunately on node lost, my stateful workloads using rook-ceph block storage won't migrate over to another node automatically due to an issue with rook. Stateless apps (ingress nginx, etc..) not using rook-ceph block failover to another node just fine. I've kind of accepted this for now and I know Longhorn has a feature that makes this work but I find rook-ceph to be more stable for my workloads.
What are some alternatives?
argo-rollouts - Progressive Delivery for Kubernetes
longhorn - Cloud-Native distributed storage built on and for Kubernetes
argo-cd - Declarative Continuous Deployment for Kubernetes
ceph-csi - CSI driver for Ceph
spinnaker - Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform for releasing software changes with high velocity and confidence.
velero - Backup and migrate Kubernetes applications and their persistent volumes
Flux - Successor: https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2
Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface
terraform-k8s - Terraform Cloud Operator for Kubernetes
Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform
terraform-controller - Use K8s to Run Terraform
hub-feedback - Feedback and bug reports for the Docker Hub