firezone VS wg-easy

https://github.com/firezone/firezone (4.4k stars)

Firezone might be an option. WG based, easy to deploy. Enterprise features etc. https://github.com/firezone/firezone

If you were looking for something other then an openVPN based VPN. Take a look at Tailscale or https://github.com/firezone/firezone which run Wireguard... Tailscale is nice however you don't manage the control plane.

Firezone (https://github.com/firezone/firezone) Wireguard-VPN Server with SSO capability

Check out wg-easy on GitHub. There is also a wg with pinole on their page. Works so easily together. https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy

sounds like you just want wg-easy.

This wg-easy?

Definitely not an OSI approved license, but does look like they made an attempt in the spirit of GPL, no?

https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy/blob/master/LICENSE.md

> You may:

Use this software for yourself;

Use this software for a company;

Modify this software, as long as you:

Publish the changes on GitHub as an open-source & linked fork;

Don't remove any links to the original project or donation pages;

You may not:

Use this software in a commercial product without a license from the original author;

wg-easy running in Docker. Then access it using WireGuard on my mobile devices.

Just plain wg-easy (wireguard with frontend). No 3rd parties involved, just me & my endpoint

I suggest running a VPN server like wireguard (very easy to install on phone and set up using https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy) and have the port open only to that. The VPN will do the rest in terms of NATing ports and whatnot.

https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy (7.6k stars)

I use wg-easy for now https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy