firejail
src
firejail | src | |
---|---|---|
139 | 747 | |
5,482 | 3,077 | |
- | 1.9% | |
9.7 | 10.0 | |
2 days ago | 2 days ago | |
C | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
firejail
-
Sandboxing All the Things with Flatpak and BubbleBox
bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.
Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.
If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
-
Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.
I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:
```
-
Toolship: A (More) Secure Workstation
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/
Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.
This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...
TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.
Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.
-
Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).
Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":
- Firejail: Light featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Do, or do not. There is no try
Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc
-
Strange times make for strange friends...
What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?
src
- OpenBSD 7.3 を 7.4 へ アップグレード
-
OpenBSD Upgrade 7.3 to 7.4
The OpenBSD project released 7.4 of their OS on 16 Oct 2023 as their 55th release 💫
-
OpenBSD System-Call Pinning
Well since https://www.openbsd.org/ still says
> Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!
I'm assuming not, but I could always be mistaken.
- Project Bluefin: an immutable, developer-focused, Cloud-native Linux
-
From Nand to Tetris: Building a Modern Computer from First Principles
> building a cat from scratch
> That would be an interesting project.
Here is the source code of the OpenBSD implementation of cat:
> https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/bin/cat/cat.c
and here of the GNU coreutils implementation:
> https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/blob/master/src/cat.c
Thus: I don't think building a cat from scratch or creating a tutorial about that topic is particularly hard (even though the HN audience would likely be interested in it). :-)
-
OpenBSD – pinning all system calls
> I don't know how they define `MAX`, but I'm guessing it's a typical "a>b?a:b"
Indeed: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/sys/sys/param.h#L...
> Then `SYS_kbind` seems to be a signed int.
It's an untyped #define: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/sys/sys/syscall.h...
I believe your whole analysis is correct, that running an elf file with an openbsd.syscalls entry with .sysno > INT_MAX will allow an out-of-bounds write.
- Une nouvelle mise à jour de Systemd permettra à Linux de bénéficier de l'infâme "écran bleu de la mort" de Windows, mais la fonctionnalité a reçu un accueil très mitigé
-
tmux causing ANSI color-response garbage on attaching?
I can reproduce it. And this is the commit that causes the issue: https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/d21788ce70be80e9c4ed0c52c149e01147c4a823
-
Sudo-rs' first security audit
This doesn’t really change your conclusion, but I think that’s the wrong file. This is the real doas afaict: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/usr.bin/doas/doas...
Still just a tidy 1072 lines in that folder though.
I spent 5 minutes staring at your file trying to understand how on earth it does the things in the man page, but of course it doesn’t.
-
OpenBSD: Removing syscall(2) from libc and kernel
OpenBSD developers are making serious effort to kill off indirect syscalls, the base system is completely clean, take a look at the work Andrew Fresh did to adapt Perl. He write a complete syscall "dispatcher" or emulator for the Perl syscall function so that it calls the libc stubs.
https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/312e26c80be876012ae979...
The ports tree is also being cleansed of syscall(2) usage, until they're all gone.
msyscall, pinsyscall, recent mandatory IBT/BTI, xonly. OpenBSD is making waves, but people aren't really seeing them yet.
What are some alternatives?
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
bastille - Bastille is an open-source system for automating deployment and management of containerized applications on FreeBSD.
bubblejail - Bubblewrap based sandboxing for desktop applications
buttersink - Buttersink is like rsync for btrfs snapshots
Flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions
PHPT - The PHP Interpreter
yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning
Joomla! - Home of the Joomla! Content Management System
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
ctl - The C Template Library