firefox-performance-dashboards
PokedexNFF
| firefox-performance-dashboards | PokedexNFF | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1 | |
| 66 | 2 | |
| - | - | |
| 2.7 | 10.0 | |
| 12 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
| JavaScript | JavaScript | |
| Mozilla Public License 2.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
firefox-performance-dashboards
-
Chrome's next weapon in the War on Ad Blockers: Slower extension updates
> Show me these pages that Firefox doesn't render well.
I'm not doing homework for you. Lots of pages don't render well in Firefox, it's a well known issue which is why it comes up in every thread about Firefox.
> Show me pages that tank Firefox performance.
Firefox in general performs poorly. Again, known long-term ongoing issue. Look at this thread where almost every top-level comment is sceptical that Firefox is even close to Chrome in performance: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36770883
You can find ongoing performance benchmarks between Chrome and Firefox here, and it's not flattering for FF: https://arewefastyet.com
> How many of them will have -webkit-* and other engine-exclusive markup/CSS?
I don't care, at all. It's not my job, as a user, to debug performance problems.
> Firefox updates every 6 weeks, just like Chrome.
Ok? I didn't say anything about update cadence.
- Firefox Got Faster for Real Users in 2023
- Firefox 117 Beta 8 vs. Google Chrome 116 Linux Browser Performance
-
Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
The link is terrible. Maybe the article should link to https://arewefastyet.com or maybe the Speedometer selection at https://arewefastyet.com/win10/benchmarks/raptor-desktop-spe...
-
Firefox on par with Chrome in Sunspider benchmarks on Windows
Well I would wager a guess it's due to consistency. The full site includes a bunch of different benchmarks, with a lot of them having the y axis as execution time in milliseconds. Meaning, lower is better. They probably just wanted to keep that consistency even with tests that use scores. Definitely a bit misleading without the full context. The full site is arewefastyet.com
-
Chrome's new Maglev compiler leads to latest Speedometer, Jetstream increases
They do... They just don't have the resources Google does. If you see https://arewefastyet.com you can see that Firefox has been steadily improving in speed, and they have actually recently been working to make react faster.
-
Firefox Javascript Performance Approaching Chrome
I filed a bug for that.
PokedexNFF
What are some alternatives?
Librefox - Librefox: Firefox with privacy enhancements
shopping-cart - Shopping Cart to purchase weapons in hunters' dream
tridactyl - A Vim-like interface for Firefox, inspired by Vimperator/Pentadactyl.
Portfolio-web-app - 🌈 Everything you need to know about me.
analytics.usa.gov - The US federal government's web traffic.
github_user_profile - simple app that fetches a github user's repositories
treestyletab - Tree Style Tab, Show tabs like a tree.
hedron - A no-frills flexbox grid system for React, powered by styled-components.
animexninja - Anime Streaming Web App built with NextJS
hyperfine - A command-line benchmarking tool
home-automation-ui - Home Automation Web Application UI built using ReactJS