fiat
Mostly Automated Synthesis of Correct-by-Construction Programs (by mit-plv)
| fiat | line-combination-proofs | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 145 | 0 | |
| 1.4% | - | |
| 6.9 | 0.0 | |
| 13 days ago | almost 2 years ago | |
| Coq | TeX | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fiat
Posts with mentions or reviews of fiat.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-18.
-
Magma, a project I hope will make provably correct software possible for everyone
Yeah once this project is actually real it could be used for that ha :) Your description kinda reminds me fiat: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat which generates code from just a correctness specification.
line-combination-proofs
Posts with mentions or reviews of line-combination-proofs.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-18.
-
Magma, a project I hope will make provably correct software possible for everyone
I have verified some theory in Coq https://github.com/joonazan/line-combination-proofs/tree/master/proofs and would like to verify a Rust implementation, too.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing fiat and line-combination-proofs you can also consider the following projects:
Rudra - Rust Memory Safety & Undefined Behavior Detection
magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.
electrolysis - Simple verification of Rust programs via functional purification in Lean 2(!)
tectonic - A modernized, complete, self-contained TeX/LaTeX engine, powered by XeTeX and TeXLive.
prusti-dev - A static verifier for Rust, based on the Viper verification infrastructure.
rust-verification-tools - RVT is a collection of tools/libraries to support both static and dynamic verification of Rust programs.
fiat vs Rudra
line-combination-proofs vs magmide
fiat vs electrolysis
line-combination-proofs vs electrolysis
fiat vs magmide
line-combination-proofs vs Rudra
fiat vs tectonic
line-combination-proofs vs prusti-dev
fiat vs prusti-dev
line-combination-proofs vs tectonic
line-combination-proofs vs rust-verification-tools