electrolysis
Simple verification of Rust programs via functional purification in Lean 2(!) (by Kha)
| line-combination-proofs | electrolysis | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 0 | 322 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 10.0 | |
| almost 2 years ago | about 7 years ago | |
| TeX | Lean | |
| - | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
line-combination-proofs
Posts with mentions or reviews of line-combination-proofs.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-18.
-
Magma, a project I hope will make provably correct software possible for everyone
I have verified some theory in Coq https://github.com/joonazan/line-combination-proofs/tree/master/proofs and would like to verify a Rust implementation, too.
electrolysis
Posts with mentions or reviews of electrolysis.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-03.
-
What Vale Taught Me About Linear Types, Borrowing, and Memory Safety
How do you represent this?
However, this insight holds for relatively common forms of ownership, and you can see this exploited in electrolysis: https://github.com/Kha/electrolysis
-
Magma, a project I hope will make provably correct software possible for everyone
In my opinion the best way of going about it is translating the Rust to Coq that has the same semantics (but different performance) as pioneered in https://github.com/Kha/electrolysis. Unfortunately that project isn't usable today as it requires an ancient version of Rust and Lean.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing line-combination-proofs and electrolysis you can also consider the following projects:
magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.
Rudra - Rust Memory Safety & Undefined Behavior Detection
fiat - Mostly Automated Synthesis of Correct-by-Construction Programs
prusti-dev - A static verifier for Rust, based on the Viper verification infrastructure.
tectonic - A modernized, complete, self-contained TeX/LaTeX engine, powered by XeTeX and TeXLive.
rust-verification-tools - RVT is a collection of tools/libraries to support both static and dynamic verification of Rust programs.
line-combination-proofs vs magmide
electrolysis vs Rudra
line-combination-proofs vs Rudra
electrolysis vs fiat
line-combination-proofs vs prusti-dev
electrolysis vs magmide
line-combination-proofs vs tectonic
electrolysis vs prusti-dev
line-combination-proofs vs rust-verification-tools
electrolysis vs tectonic