cash
hyperscript
cash | hyperscript | |
---|---|---|
19 | 24 | |
6,423 | 2,589 | |
- | 0.0% | |
4.5 | 0.0 | |
2 months ago | almost 3 years ago | |
JavaScript | HTML | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cash
-
pure javascript vs jquery vs react for a complex, downloadable text based browser game with state management?
Maybe a small JQuery clone like a Cash - https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash or SurfJS https://surf.monster/ (Surf has a delay/queue, reactive templates) might help for writing less code and is still JavaScript
- Stack bun pentru extensie chrome+firefox
-
Migrate jQuery to VanillaJS - UpgradeJS.com
If stock jQuery seems too big and you have a lot of code you'd prefer not to waste time converting, try something like jQuery-slim or cash.
-
jQuery Terminal: JavaScript Web Based Terminal Emulator
It was initially released in 2010. But there is a plan to create version 3.0 that will be rewritten in TypeScript and without dependency on jQuery. The plan is to use a modern Cash library to not modify the code that much.
-
Developers with 20+ years of experience already know the drill
I find that cash.js does everything I need from Jquery and it's a fraction of the size, it's great to see advancements in technology to the point that you can fit that much functionality into 6KB
-
An Insanely small plugin extendable, reactive element template library with optional component based syntax that can also double as JQuery Alternative.
Yes but it's more than just that. In relation to DOM manipulation libs like JQuery it's small and on par with something like https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash
-
The impact of removing jQuery on our web performance
If you are mainly using jquery for its DOM manipulation¹ rather than for browser compatibility² or things that didn't exist consistently in older browsers³ then there are much smaller libraries that do that job which may be worth looking into. https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash or https://github.com/franciscop/umbrella to give a couple of examples. Some explicitly support IE11 so you are not dropping as much support for legacy browsers as you might otherwise.
Though if jQuery works for you and isn't a performance issue, then by all means keep with it. It may not be ideal, but good enough and does the job. Let the naysayers spend their time debating whether you should or not, and just get on with making things!
---
[1] selection engine, chained selections, chained modifications, …
[2] not the issue it once was, if you can abandon IE and old Android browsers from your supported UAs or can deal with any issues that crop up individually
[3] again, if you can afford to drop support for legacy UAs
-
Gov.uk drops jQuery from their front end
I think it's a bit of both. jQuery served the purpose of making web development more sane back in the day by handling all browser quirks. Part of that was the nice syntax.
I personally have tried to drop jQuery, but truthfully, its syntax is just much easier to use. Nowadays, I use Cash https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash to give me the nice syntax without the bloat. It strikes the perfect balance for me.
-
What's still being done on the web today that irks you?
Taking a look at Cash so I don't have to rewrite a metric flock-ton of code. https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash. Looking through the migration guide, I don't see any issues that affect my codebase (famous last words).
-
Replacing jQuery (110kb) With UmbrellaJS (8kb)
Cash's maintainer here. I don't think this is true actually.
Zepto supports some methods that Cash doesn't, but you probably shouldn't use them to begin with, like $.ajax, $.isArray, $.fn.animate etc. In 2022 either better built-in solutions exist or better specialized tiny libraries exist.
Everything that is supported by both Zepto and Cash should either work identically or Cash's implementation should be closer to jQuery's. Just to mention one thing in this regard you can run jQuery's test suite with Cash, and Cash's test suite with jQuery, easily [0]. I've done so and looked at every single failed test manually a few times, I doubt nearly the same level of attention went into Zepto. Just to mention one difference: Cash supports jQuery-style event namespacing, Zepto just doesn't support this.
[0]: https://github.com/fabiospampinato/cash/blob/272132a6dc1d885...
hyperscript
-
Ludic: New framework for Python with seamless Htmx support
* https://github.com/hyperhype/hyperscript
There is also a working integration with Django that enables the use of neat-html as a template backend, however it isn't up on GitHub yet.
I find the space of HTML generation libraries which can leverage the power of Python, really interesting.
-
Intro to Hyperscript: Rethinking JavaScript
Does anyone else get this confused with https://github.com/hyperhype/hyperscript ?
-
DOM to JSON and back
This works like Reactʼs createElement function. Or a library such as hyperscript. Sure, weʼd prefer JSX for its much reduced cognitive load. But our alternative here is the DOM methods such as createElement. Unless we want to load up a bulky library such as React, that is.
-
Experimenting with html in object form. How cursed is this?
Consider looking at hyperscript, which is a plain-javascript library for constructing html nodes (NOT a transpiler). Similar to what you have here, but way nicer
-
What is the state of the art for creating domain-specific languages (DSLs) with Rust?
In fairness, there's a lot of overlap between embedded DSLs and libraries — a library like Hyperscript for generating HTML in JavaScript is in many ways a DSL, but it's also just a bunch of functions that are easy to put together in a particular way. But this is often good enough!
-
Ask HN: What happened to vanilla HTML/CSS/JS development?
Hyperscript (https://github.com/hyperhype/hyperscript) is actually quite nice when you get used to it, and I actually prefer it over JSX. Pair it with something like microh[0], and it gets even better.
[0] https://github.com/fuzetsu/microh
-
_hyperscript – a small scripting language for the web
The naming of this project clashes horribly with https://github.com/hyperhype/hyperscript. It's not like it's in a different ecosystem or something. It is a web project that is guaranteed to cause confusion.
-
My thoughts on Mithril.js
With Mithril.js, you generate HTML using a hyperscript dialect like this:
-
Show HN: A simple Wordle clone in 60 lines, using Hyperscript
I'm confused. Hyperscript is supposed to be an alternative way to writing JSX.
Hyperscript.org doesn't seem to be related to this at all?
https://github.com/hyperhype/hyperscript
-
Hyperscript - the hidden language of React
The reason is dead simple. It's exported as h because it's a hypescript function. So what exactly is hypescript?
What are some alternatives?
jQuery - jQuery JavaScript Library
Alpine.js - A rugged, minimal framework for composing JavaScript behavior in your markup.
gomponents - View components in pure Go, that render to HTML 5.
zepto - Zepto.js is a minimalist JavaScript library for modern browsers, with a jQuery-compatible API
Alpine
umbrella - :umbrella: Lightweight javascript library for DOM manipulation and events
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
replace-jquery - Automatically finds jQuery methods from existing projects and generates vanilla js alternatives.
reagent - A minimalistic ClojureScript interface to React.js
django-webpack-loader - Transparently use webpack with django
window.fetch polyfill - A window.fetch JavaScript polyfill.