exploit-CVE-2017-7494
SambaCry exploit and vulnerable container (CVE-2017-7494) (by opsxcq)
esp-idf-smb-client
SMB client example for esp-idf (by nopnop2002)
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 | esp-idf-smb-client | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |
367 | 17 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 5.9 | |
over 1 year ago | 4 months ago | |
C | C | |
- | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
exploit-CVE-2017-7494
Posts with mentions or reviews of exploit-CVE-2017-7494.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Anybody know if old Samba on CentOS 6 is even vulnerable to EternalRed/sambacry/7494? It should be….
I’m trying to exploit samba version 3 on CentOS 6. I have tried CentOS 6.3 and 6.4, and I can’t get it to work. I’ve also tried different hypervisors (ESXi and KVM) and both the metasploit module and the opsxcq script here https://github.com/opsxcq/exploit-CVE-2017-7494 .
esp-idf-smb-client
Posts with mentions or reviews of esp-idf-smb-client.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Samba share client
Low effort, seriously... It's the first result... https://github.com/nopnop2002/esp-idf-smb-client
What are some alternatives?
When comparing exploit-CVE-2017-7494 and esp-idf-smb-client you can also consider the following projects:
windows-kernel-exploits - windows-kernel-exploits Windows平台提权漏洞集合
esp-at - AT application for ESP32/ESP32-C2/ESP32-C3/ESP32-C6/ESP8266
redis-rogue-server - Redis(<=5.0.5) RCE
esp32_nat_router - A simple NAT Router for the ESP32
h-encore - Fully chained kernel exploit for the PS Vita on firmwares 3.65-3.68
DDOS-RootSec - DDOS Archive by RootSec (Scanners, BotNets (Mirai and QBot Premium & Normal and more), Exploits, Methods, Sniffers)
Samba - https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba is the Official GitLab mirror of https://git.samba.org/samba.git -- Merge requests should be made on GitLab (not on GitHub)
universal-otherapp - Userland -> Kernel11 -> Arm9 otherapp for 3DS system versions 1.0 to <= 11.15
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs windows-kernel-exploits
esp-idf-smb-client vs esp-at
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs redis-rogue-server
esp-idf-smb-client vs esp32_nat_router
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs h-encore
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs DDOS-RootSec
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs Samba
exploit-CVE-2017-7494 vs universal-otherapp