haskell
Exercism exercises in Haskell. (by exercism)
pointfree.io
A web site for converting haskell code into pointfree haskell code (by keathley)
| haskell | pointfree.io | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 7 | |
| 477 | 160 | |
| -0.2% | - | |
| 8.1 | 10.0 | |
| 2 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
| Haskell | HTML | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
haskell
Posts with mentions or reviews of haskell.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-07.
- como saber o que é melhor de se fazer com cada linguagem de programação?
-
Custom set implementation
I am working the Exercism Haskell Track and one of the questions asks for a custom set implementation. I studied some community solutions to see what other folks are doing, and came across something that I don't quite understand.
- Pedagogical Downsides of Haskell
-
Update book library: Slowing down development
Starting today, I'll resume solving exercises in Exercism, focusing on my Python and Haskell tracks.
-
Anything like 4clojure for Haskell?
I did see https://exercism.org/tracks/haskell , as well, but I'm not sure if that's what I'm looking for and I won't know until I make an account. I'd rather not make an account unless it actually provides what I'm looking for.
- Best way to learn Haskell
-
Which solution is better, and why?
"Best" solution here: https://github.com/exercism/haskell/blob/main/exercises/practice/acronym/.meta/examples/success-text/src/Acronym.hs
-
Anyone here programmed in Haskell after taking 61a? If so what was your experience like, do you think what you learned in 61a made Haskell easier or more enjoyable for you?
Haskell is a really interesting language, and if you're comfortable with Scheme from 61a then many of the concepts carry over. However, Haskell has a pretty steep learning curve (in comparison to Clojure which is much closer to Scheme). I've been using https://exercism.org/tracks/haskell and been finding it fun so far.
-
Efficient probability testing
To explore this space I created an Exercism exercise called dnd-character.
pointfree.io
Posts with mentions or reviews of pointfree.io.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-24.
- Tacit Programming
-
Custom set implementation
You can test out things like that at https://pointfree.io. It takes a lambda with all the arguments present, like \ a b c -> f (g a b c), and it produces ((f .) .) . g.
-
Inner (dot) product in tacit point-free form
I'm learning Haskell, coming from the APL family. I'm familiar with point-free style and function composition and wanted to learn Haskell for a more pure functional experience. To get some practice i figured I'd write up the dot product and vector product functions. I haven't begun looking at the vector product, but for dot product I quickly came to `dot a b = sum $ zipWith (*) a b`. After toying around with composition (the B-combinator .), I couldn't get it to work. I looked up the tacit solution in pointfree.io, and it gave me the short and sweet `dot = (sum .) . zipWith (*)`. Now here's my question: how is (sum .) supposed to work? I don't get where the arguments implicitly go or how this makes syntactically sense. What is the order of operations?
-
Is there functional programming simplifier or sanitizer that uses the no side effect phenomenon?
Pointfree sort of does that https://pointfree.io/
-
Try the wasm port of pointfree
This is great! And timely too, since http://pointfree.io seems to be down at the moment. It’s also nice to see that the WASM backend is already usable.
-
Monthly Hask Anything (December 2022)
The source code seems to be here: https://github.com/keathley/pointfree.io
What are some alternatives?
When comparing haskell and pointfree.io you can also consider the following projects:
elixir - Exercism exercises in Elixir.
adventofcode - Advent of Code solutions of 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 in Scala
ruby - Exercism exercises in Ruby.
WASI - WebAssembly System Interface
java - Exercism exercises in Java.
flyctl - Command line tools for fly.io services
python - Exercism exercises in Python.
wasmer-js - Monorepo for Javascript WebAssembly packages by Wasmer
problem-specifications - Shared metadata for exercism exercises.
bash - Exercism exercises in Bash.
awesome-haskell - A collection of awesome Haskell links, frameworks, libraries and software. Inspired by awesome projects line.
clash-ghc - Haskell to VHDL/Verilog/SystemVerilog compiler