evans VS cargo-edit

Note: gRPC services can also be tested from CLI using tools like evans-cli. But for that reflection needs (if not enabled the path to the proto file is required) to be enabled in gRPC servers. This compare link shows the way to enable reflection and how to enter into evans-cli repl mode. Post entering repl mode of evans-cli, gRPC services can be tested from CLI itself and the process is described in evans-cli GitHub page.

Do you mean this one https://github.com/ktr0731/evans ?

I use Evans, it supports gRPC and gRPC-web and also supports reflection protocol.

https://github.com/ktr0731/evans it's the best cli tool I've ever used

Over the holidays, 2021, Postman gifted a fine upgrade to its users: beta support for the gRPC protocol in its API platform. As a Product Manager for Lightbend and helping out on its new gRPC native PaaS for building and running APIs and microservices, I was excited, to say the least. In another, recent blog post, I mentioned my desire to leverage UI test-and-try tools for APIs (my time in the REST API world of Mashery and PubNub was the source of such desire). In that same post though, I noted the lack of several important gRPC features, like server reflection and more robust import capabilities, as blockers; hence, my deep dive, in that post, into the CLI tool, Evans.

And who am I kidding? I'm a CLI-type person. Which is why I was super excited to stumble about Evans. Within minutes, I had gone from installation to trying out TLS-secured APIs and microservices running in the cloud on Lightbend's new serverless offering.

If everything is set up correctly, you should now be able to use evans to access your web server at the load balancer url or even the url for your ec2 instance directly e.g.

After running the server with cargo run, I needed a way to test that the server works. I had heard of an interesting tool called evans, so I decided to use this. It took me a while to figure out the right parameters to query the server, especially because tonic doesn't seem to support gRPC reflection right now, and there are few examples out there.

For testing gRPC we can use evans and need add reflection:

“cargo add” from https://github.com/killercup/cargo-edit has that behavior, but not the built in one that was added to cargo

I have also noticed that the last commit of cargo-edit crate's GitHub repo (https://github.com/killercup/cargo-edit) was two days ago (pretty recent.) So it is probably relevant for a lot of people.

cargo-upgrade from cargo-edit (somewhat more intentional than builtin update)

I've also tried cargo-upgrade from cargo-edit like so:

You can also see how other crates do it. For example, cargo-edit is just like that - a single package with a library with a couple of small cli wrappers around it. You can compare their Cargo.toml to yours, maybe there is something different about them.

Just to check, are you aware of cargo-edit's cargo-set-version or cargo-release?

Speaking of cargo remove, see also cargo-edit [0] from which adding and removing originally came, as well as cargo-binstall [1] which installs binaries rather than compiling from source every time. The binaries are updatable with cargo-update [2].

The latter two can replace a package manager for Rust related utilities, as I often find that those in OS package repositories are often not as up to date as directly from cargo.

[0] https://github.com/killercup/cargo-edit

[1] https://github.com/cargo-bins/cargo-binstall

[2] https://github.com/nabijaczleweli/cargo-update

For context, it was/is part of cargo-edit crate which provides other nice functionalities as well. Hope all gets integrated in time.

https://github.com/killercup/cargo-edit can use the F option