Etherpad VS sciter-js-sdk

Did you try https://etherpad.org ?

Check out etherpad. It's an awesome solution. It's got collaboration, and over 200 plugins.

You can try to: - wipe all of the data of standard notes app by holding down on it, clicking "app info", going to the storage section and tapping both "clear storage" and "clear cache" buttons - Install an older version of the app. This has fixed my problem with Bitwarden refusing to work on my device. (Until it broke again, but luckily the latest version works fine) - Try a different note taking app. I don't know many of them, but by doing a quick startpage search I've found https://simplenote.com/. It seems to be free and open source as well as providing cloud sync. - Use Etherpad. This works by sharing a permanent link to a file stored on one of the etherpad's servers, and anyone with the link can edit it and view it in real time. Of course, the disadvantage is no encryption, as it is meant for collaboration while writing books and such.

Etherpad Lite is basically selfhosted Google Docs, and it's pretty straightforward but can be extended with various plugins. https://etherpad.org/

Google doc replacement -> https://etherpad.org/

Sudo doesn't work in the container, so I'm running bash and doing apt-get update and getting the error. Base image is Etherpad

How tiny is the output? What is the API? (I couldn't find any documentation. I thought maybe it's in the Help menu in the app itself but all I found was this https://i.imgur.com/6puOMIe.png - On that note, what level of JS is supported? As far as I can tell it uses this https://github.com/c-smile/sciter-js-sdk which is based on Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS ) Is there sound?

JavaScript & Electron Sciter!

Having normal procedural language for build automation is of course useful. That's for those 10% of cases when "standard" build DSL (make,CMake,etc.) simply do not have facilities.

But the rest of 90% tasks should have compact (easily readable) definitions.

I personally found that Premake5 has quite good balance for these tasks.

Premake files are plain .lua files and due to Lua syntax they are easily readable. And if needed you can call from them procedures defined in again Lua.

So typical project (multiplatform) definition looks pretty readable, for example one project from Sciter SDK:

https://github.com/c-smile/sciter-js-sdk/blob/main/premake5....

More details.

That's why in Sciter I've extended JSX with translation meta instruction @:

Note Tauri is full fledged Client/Server with WebView (client) is running in separate process with RPC between UI process and Rust code (Server).

For the comparison:

Standalone Sciter (scapp.exe, https://github.com/c-smile/sciter-js-sdk/tree/main/bin) takes ~8 MB of RAM (with minimal Cairo and GDI backends).

That's 20 times less than even Tauri.

WebView based solutions are not suitable for applets - small portable desktop applications.

scapp.exe ( Standalone sciter engine ) takes 45 Mb showing its default "about" document.

It does support , with limited support but still.

See: https://github.com/c-smile/sciter-js-sdk/tree/main/samples/c...

Sciter also supports immediate mode painting on any element (like in DearIMGUI):

    element.paintBackground = function(gfx) {