ethereum-economic-model VS nbdev

Recently, since coming across FastAI and nbdev[0], I've been moving increasingly to a more notebook-centric flow. So far it's been better particularly for the exploration aspect where I've primarily used ptpython in the past (and this isn't anywhere ML-related). I think the idea behind nbdev is pretty neat, but it pushes some practices that I'm not a fan of at all. I want to get to the point where I have a mostly complete IDE experience in the notebook so I don't have to keep switching back and forth. I have a ways to go.

[0] https://nbdev.fast.ai/

One example I've seen is ML/DL folks using jupyter notebooks to develop DL libraries in jupyter notebooks, see https://github.com/fastai/nbdev

- https://github.com/fastai/nbdev: Increase developer productivity by 10x with a new exploratory programming workflow.

9. Nbdev: Boost developer productivity with an exploratory programming workflow - https://nbdev.fast.ai/

See if you like nbdev way of working with data through python and jupyter. nbdev is an optional part that will create python packages from jupyter notebooks. Also even the simple tutorials are opinionated and will guide you to unit test your code and write CICD pipelines.

You probably don’t have time for this for the purposes of your task, but I will also throw in the recommendation of nbdev especially if you’re a Python person. I haven’t had a project to use it on yet, but I’ve gone through the docs and the walkthrough and it seems like a great framework for starting potential projects with all the infrastructure needed for if/when they eventually get big and need all the packaging and stuff

nbdev: jupyter notebooks -> python package

Take a look at https://github.com/fastai/nbdev - haven't used it but supposedly the whole if fast.ai library was written that way. It sounds like a natural direction in your scenario - allowing your to keep working in a familiar environment and still producing production ready code (will, at least in paper 😅)