error-message-index
error-messages
Our great sponsors
error-message-index | error-messages | |
---|---|---|
5 | 18 | |
94 | 73 | |
- | - | |
8.2 | 0.0 | |
about 1 month ago | almost 2 years ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
error-message-index
-
There is No “Tooling Issue” in Haskell
Significant effort is going into resolving this issue right now and things should be much improved in 9.6. We already have https://errors.haskell.org/ which catalogues many errors with descriptions and examples. The asspciated error codes will be added to all errors once 9.6 is release for easy reference.
-
[ANN] GHCup-0.1.19.0 released
We're also delighted to announce integration with errors.haskell.org, which already has a couple of GHCup codes documented, e.g. https://errors.haskell.org/messages/GHCup-00010/
-
[ANN] First release candidate for stack-2.9.3
To support the Haskell Foundation’s Haskell Error Index initiative, all Stack error messages generated by Stack itself begin with an unique code in the form [S-nnnn], where nnnn is a four-digit number.
-
What prevents Haskell from having good error messages?
I don't think the resolved issues are actually ones about error messages. They largely seem to be meta issues about the project. As far as I know nothing that project has done has made it into a released GHC yet, but GHC 9.6 will have unique error codes for each error pointing to an entry on https://errors.haskell.org/. Both the codes and the website are achievements of that project, specifically under its error-messages-index incarnation. If you'd like to contribute you may like to read https://github.com/haskellfoundation/error-message-index/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md or post a message introducing yourself on https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/new.
error-messages
-
Why did GHC go from "occurs check failed" to talking about rigid type variables?
The GHC issue tracker or the error message improvement repo are two such places to get clarification (and potentially improve the message even if it turns out to be technically correct).
-
Please help!
Indeed there is a ticket and the error message is somewhat better in 9.4 although it still doesn't mention the guard.
-
What prevents Haskell from having good error messages?
Note that the Num literal issue is tracked here and there seems to be a good suggestion to fix it: https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/5#issuecomment-1040788806
-
GHC: could not deduce [instance]
I think it would be great to post this over at https://github.com/haskell/error-messages too so that we can track it more easily than here on Reddit.
-
How to get better compiler error messages?
Also, reminder that https://github.com/haskell/error-messages exists to track these kind of issues. Feel free to open an issue there.
-
Unable to get this to compile
If you are able to articulate what aspects of the error messages you find hard to understand, please do open an issue on https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. (Or reply here then I can open an issue for you if you don't have a github account.) It doesn't have to be a concrete suggestion for improvement, even just knowing which messages are bad can be useful.
-
Another Confusing Haskell Error Message
Do you know about https://github.com/haskell/error-messages
-
Was simplified subsumption worth it for industry Haskell programmers?
The error message is at the least very unhelpful. Please report it on https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/new
-
How do I specify the type inside function definition?
Please do open an issue at https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. The issue itself can be as simple as just summarizing what you wrote here, it doesn't have to immediately suggest a good alternative. That issue tracker is in the first place intended to document all error messages that Haskellers struggle with.
-
Haskell Error Messages: Come on!
Do check out https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. We have a related discussion here: https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/5, but I think perhaps a separate issue for this case would be good to have.
What are some alternatives?
pantry
ghc - Mirror of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Please submit issues and patches to GHC's Gitlab instance (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc). First time contributors are encouraged to get started with the newcomers info (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/contributing).
haskell-mode - Emacs mode for Haskell
tech-proposals - The Haskell Foundation Tech Proposal Process
ghci-dap - ghci having DAP interface.
ghc-proposals - Proposed compiler and language changes for GHC and GHC/Haskell
debug-adapter-protocol - Defines a common protocol for debug adapters.
pool-conduit - Persistence interface for Haskell allowing multiple storage methods.
text - Haskell library for space- and time-efficient operations over Unicode text.
hlint - Haskell source code suggestions
ghcup-hs - THIS REPO IS A MIRROR, BUG REPORTS GO HERE:
Cabal - Official upstream development repository for Cabal and cabal-install