erfa
Transformers.jl
erfa | Transformers.jl | |
---|---|---|
2 | 7 | |
125 | 505 | |
0.0% | - | |
4.0 | 5.4 | |
9 days ago | about 13 hours ago | |
C | Julia | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
erfa
- Julia 1.10 Released
-
License Adherence Help
I'm working on a pure Rust approximation of astropy. Up til now, I was able to recreate the intent by looking at an external API, but I'm moving on to functionality that I don't understand enough to implement without basically copying the code. Astropy uses the BSD-3 license, and it wraps the ERFA library which uses a custom license. My project currently uses the MIT license. My PR is here - my question is have I attributed everything correctly, or is there anything I need to change for everything to be above-board?
Transformers.jl
-
Julia 1.10 Released
Flux is quite a nice lower level library:
https://github.com/FluxML/Flux.jl
On top of that there are many higher level libraries such as Transformers.jl
https://github.com/chengchingwen/Transformers.jl
- How is Julia Performance with GPUs (for LLMs)?
-
Load a transformer model with julia
Check out Transformers.jl. It’s a library that implements transformer based models in Julia using Flux.jl. They have support for some of the huggingface transformers.
-
Ask HN: Why hasn't the Deep Learning community embraced Julia yet?
https://github.com/chengchingwen/Transformers.jl but I have not had any personal experience with.
All of this is build by the community and your mileage may vary.
In my rather biased opinion the strengths of Julia are that the various ML libraries can share implementations, e.g. Pytorch and Tensorflow contain separate Numpy derivatives. One could say that you can write an ML framework in Julia, instead of writting a DSL in Python as part of your C++ ML library. As an example Julia has a GPU compiler so you can write your own layer directly in Julia and integrate it into your pipeline.
-
Help on Differentiable Programming
I think you might have some luck with looking at a transformers implementation in flux, e.g: https://github.com/chengchingwen/Transformers.jl/tree/master/src/basic
-
Fastai.jl: Fastai for Julia
Having tried fastai for a "serious" research project and helped (just a bit) towards FastAI.jl development, here's my take:
> motivation behind this is unclear.
Julia currently has two main DL libraries. Flux, which is somewhere between PyTorch and (tf.)Keras abstraction wise, and Knet, which is a little lower level (think just below PyTorch/around where MXNet Gluon sits). Frameworks like fastai, PyTorch Lightning and Keras demonstrate that there's a desire for higher-level, more batteries included libraries. FastAI.jl is looking to fill that gap in Julia.
> Since FastAI.jl uses Flux, and not PyTorch, functionality has to be reimplemented. FastAI.jl has vision support but no text support yet.
This is correct. That said, FastAI.jl is not and does not plan to be a copy of the Python API (hence "inspired by"). One consequence of this is that integration with other libraries is much easier, e.g. https://github.com/chengchingwen/Transformers.jl for NLP tasks.
> What is the timeline for FastAI.jl to achieve parity?
-
Julia Update: Adoption Keeps Climbing; Is It a Python Challenger?
If NLP primitives are all that's keeping you from testing the waters, have a look at https://github.com/chengchingwen/Transformers.jl.