kelseyhightower/envconfig VS chi

To configure the app I'd take a look at https://github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig

envconfig

- Having one way of configuring the app is excellent. You can either prefer environment variables, a file, or flags. You can do what Viper does by reading the file and unmarshalling it. The built-in flag package is enough for your flag-based config needs. If you want to prefer environment variables, I prefer https://github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig

To extract values from the system environment, I utilize envconfig, a Go package. Envconfig facilitates mapping system environment variables to a Go struct. These Go structs are exposed through a config package, enabling other parts of the application to access them.

You could prefix your env vars and use this package. https://github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig

kelseyhightower/envconfig

Pretty much all of our services and pkgs use https://github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig. It’s dead simple, gets out of your way, and is battle tested

https://github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig (read config from environment variables, more succinct than viper)

I use go-chi for handling routes and to server static file(stylesheet).

This will be the structure of our project, we will use PostgreSQL as the database, go chi to create our endpoints, go dot env to import our environment variables.

go-chi: is a lightweight, idiomatic and composable router for building Go HTTP services.

Go Chi para criar nossas rotas

For HTTP I'd look at Chi https://github.com/go-chi/chi

In fact, it has zero dependencies outside of std lib in it's core: https://github.com/go-chi/chi/blob/master/go.mod

Interesting. go-chi added it as a middleware 4 months ago, but its not in the module docs since they haven't tagged a version since Dec 2022: https://github.com/go-chi/chi/blob/master/middleware/request_size.go