ember-no-implicit-this-codemod VS putout

Glimmer component templates reflect this by using the @ prefix when using arguments and the this. prefixes when accessing properties of the backing class. This way of working is also supported in classic components, even though arguments are in the same scope as local properties. This means the migration is non blocking, and luckily there’s a codemod available for this as well. The codemod however can’t make a distinction between arguments and local properties, and is something that will be cleaned up in a later phase.

Due to its plugin-first architecture, the initial API is kept as lean as possible, preventing unnecessary bloat and allowing the developer the choice of extension. Some plugin rules are also smaller than those available in ESLint, e.g., the debugger rule. We can also use Putout with ESLint by allowing Putout to handle code transformations while ESLint handles any formatting broken after the code transformation. We can use the plugin eslint-plugin-putout to help with this integration.

🐊 Pluggable and configurable code transformer with built-in ESLint, Babel plugins support for js, jsx typescript, flow, markdown, yaml and json